Powered by RND
PodcastsEducationExtreme-Lit Review

Extreme-Lit Review

WOKESCREEN™
Extreme-Lit Review
Latest episode

Available Episodes

5 of 7
  • What are QUEER Stick and Poke Tattoos?
    As with the very purpose of this podcast, we believe it is of utmost importance to avoid generalisations or conflating groups as being synonymous simply because they may share some overlapping tendencies, grievances, beliefs, or tactics.We have emphasised the significance of prefixes within the terms used in these circles. Communism, for example, is not a monolith. It is an umbrella term that, while carrying a singular meaning on its own, encapsulates a rich tapestry of rival beliefs. Among these is the anarchist faction often referred to as anarcho-communism or, in some contexts, ANTIFA.What, then, are the aims, ambitions, and beliefs of groups that further fracture and find context within the trans movement? This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.extremelitreview.com/subscribe
    --------  
    6:00
  • What Are 'Affinity Groups'?
    This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit www.extremelitreview.comThere is a common misconception that the militant tactics of the far left operate in the same way their ideologies do. This is not the case.One of the key techniques that has made these groups successful in militant uprisings is the use of 'Affinity Groups.' While the term might suggest a simple gathering of like-minded friends, it functions more like a quasi-paramilitary sleeper cell or a small battalion in this context. As we will explore in this operations manual, 'Affinity Groups' serve not only as an integral support network adhering to anarcho-communist values but also as precision tools in the revolutionary arsenal.
    --------  
    16:57
  • What Is Trans Anarcho-Communism?
    As with the very purpose of this podcast, we believe it is of utmost importance to avoid generalisations or conflating groups as being synonymous simply because they may share some overlapping tendencies, grievances, beliefs, or tactics.We have emphasised the significance of prefixes within the terms used in these circles. Communism, for example, is not a monolith. It is an umbrella term that, while carrying a singular meaning on its own, encapsulates a rich tapestry of rival beliefs. Among these is the anarchist faction often referred to as anarcho-communism or, in some contexts, ANTIFA.What, then, are the aims, ambitions, and beliefs of groups that further fracture and find context within the trans movement? This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.extremelitreview.com/subscribe
    --------  
    7:55
  • ANTIFA Militants Account Of The First Trump Inauguration Uprising
    In this episode, we have an unparalleled glimpse into the inner thoughts of an individual who participated in the first uprising on the day of Trump’s inauguration of his first term.Much of our understanding of ANTIFA is often shaped by the media or critics, and we seldom gain direct insight into the perspectives of individual members.Below, you will find an exceptional moment of candid vulnerability. This provides us with a unique glimpse into a day of action, free from the usual propaganda often found in communications aimed at an external audience.Disclaimer'The Extreme Lit-Review' is a professional journalistic endeavour that engages with various documents for critical analysis and educational purposes. The views expressed in these documents are not those of the host or the show; they are presented for academic scrutiny to foster an understanding of diverse ideologies. This analysis is conducted under the principles of fair dealing for criticism, review, or reporting, with all content properly acknowledged. The materials discussed may include controversial, offensive, or harmful ideologies, but the intent is always to critique, contextualize, and challenge these views, not to endorse or promote them. Listeners are encouraged to approach this material critically, recognizing that the aim is to educate and inform, not to propagate the ideas presented. If any content is found distressing or appears to promote harmful stereotypes or discrimination, we respectfully suggest you prefer not to continue listening to those particular discussions. This show does not aim to incite hatred or discrimination but rather to analyze and discuss the implications and origins of various ideologies in society from a professional journalistic perspective.The following is an anonymous personal diary entry first published within the pages of an internal ANTIFA zine in 2021 to mark the start of the Biden era.January 20, 2017On the morning of January 20, 2017, I stood at the intersection of 12th Street and L Street in downtown Washington, DC. Before me, a double line of riot police separated me from the people surrounded in the kettle targeting participants in the massive black bloc march that had just torn through the city opposing the inauguration of Donald Trump.The narrow strip of no man’s land that separated us from the front line of armoured mercenaries was strewn with abandoned black apparel—sweatshirts, windbreakers, masks, gloves, scarves, bags. Not knowing what was in store for the arrestees—as it turned out, practically all of them were charged with eight or more felonies apiece, though none of those charges ultimately stuck—I figured it might be better if the street were not littered with things that might be misconstrued as evidence. I began to gather up the debris.Plucking these items from right in front of the line of officers was a risky proposition. What if the police grabbed me and pulled me into the kettle, too? Trying to look nonchalant, I managed to snatch up a scarf, then a pair of sunglasses. One of the bigger items appeared to be a full backpack. It was lying right at the foot of a glowering cop. Someone braver than me darted forward and seized it, swinging it up and withdrawing swiftly into the crowd on our side of the police line. I could see by the way the pack swung that it was heavy.I ended up with that backpack along with an armload of black clothing. There was something in the pack, that was for sure. Something heavy and solid.The crowd along the police line was outnumbered; the best I could do for my comrades was to get that stuff out of there. I stepped back from the standoff and made my way south along 12th Street. I passed the mouth of an alley, also strewn with clothing.The straps of the backpack were cutting into my shoulders. I needed to go somewhere private so I could open it up and take a look. It wouldn’t do to open it in the middle of a crowded street in full view of police officers and National Guardsmen without any idea what might be inside. I walked down to Franklin Square and found a coffee shop that was open. A dozen fresh-faced college protesters were waiting in line for the bathroom. I waited for fifteen minutes, but the line hardly moved.Eventually, I gave up and started looking for another establishment. Most of the other places were closed; some of them had lost their windows to the hammers of the black bloc. The streets in this part of DC had been desolate earlier in the day, but now they were filling up with protesters, journalists, curious locals, and the occasional Trump supporter.I walked a block west to McPherson Square. There was some protest infrastructure there, including a tent and Food Not Bombs preparing to serve a meal, but no privacy I could take advantage of to inspect my cargo.The longer I carried the backpack, the heavier it got, and the more ominous its weight became. What was inside it? What if I was walking around Washington, DC with a bomb on my back? I was starting to fear that I was a character in a story by William S. Burroughs.Looking back on that scene from the vantage point of 2021, four years later, it seems like a heavy-handed allegory. The backpack was Pandora’s box, containing all the trials and tribulations of the dawning Trump era. Its weight signified all the unthinkable things that would soon become normalized—travel bans on entire countries, fascists shooting people at demonstrations. It held the grief of all the children lost inside the detention system, separated from their parents by Border Patrol. It held the corpses of the 400,000 people who died of COVID-19 during Trump’s administration.And it held the weight of our responsibility—of our capacity to respond to these tragedies. It wasn’t until I got home that night after a full day of further adventures and narrow escapes that I was finally able to set the backpack down and look inside it. I pulled the zipper open, revealing a red metal canister—a fire extinguisher. The serial numbers had been scraped off the labels so that it, too, might participate in the anonymous collective force of the black bloc. At the bottom of Pandora’s box, hope—in the form of the actions that we can take and the courage necessary to rise to the occasion.To whoever chose to arrive thus equipped at the departure point for the J20 black blo—thank you. Your secret is safe with me.We hope you enjoyed that free preview. The Extreme Lit-Review is exclusively funded by our readers. If you would like to listen to the full episode and support our work, then please subscribe below.We hope you find value in the Extreme Lit-Review and believe in our mission. We are exclusively funded by you, the reader. If you believe more people need to hear this information, then you can gift a subscription today. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.extremelitreview.com/subscribe
    --------  
    6:34
  • Queer – An Anarchist Deconstruction
    The following is an article published in 2009 by the Anarchist Federation that provides a comprehensive overview of the term ‘Queer’, its etymology, and its current definition.So to be queer by its original meaning isn’t something necessarily offensive. Yet, still, the term evokes a great reaction from both supporters, who view the word as self-empowering and those who view the word as somehow offensive. But there is an overt and positive movement that seeks to reclaim what it is to be queer; removing from it, its old meanings of peculiarity and its homophobic connotations and replacing them with a coherent socio-political and intellectual theory that has shaped the politics of gender and sexuality immeasurably.Growing out of the sexual-radicalism of the 1990s (in the USA namely) the word queer has come to adopt more contemporary, positive and radical meanings. It is these definitions of queer that have come to stir gender and sexual politics. Queer has come to embrace two notable meanings, firstly it has come to be used as an umbrella term encompassing all those who define outside of exclusive heterosexuality. Secondly the term has come to refer more specifically to those individuals who divorce themselves from distinct gender and sexual identities (gay, male, female, trans etc.) – it is this definition that this article will concentrate on.Queer theory stems from attempts to deconstruct concepts of both gender and sexuality. Rigid concepts of sexuality such as gay and lesbian for example don’t have much bearing on many of our lives, similarly, many of us come outside of the false dualism offered by the binaries of male and female. It is becoming painfully obvious that such ‘closed’ definitions that these labels carry don’t accommodate everyone and indeed many people can be more than one at a time, can be between two or three different labels and even change their preference regarding sexuality and/or gender as their life continues. Those who buy into essentialism however would have us believe that for any specific kind of entity (in this case gays, women, trans people etc.) there is a distinct set of properties or characteristics which they must possess. But as queer people we recognise that sexual orientation and gender are not naturally binding and essential, but fluid concepts. In that vein, queer is less an identity, than a critique of identity; recognising that for those labelled with terms of gender and/or sexuality, there are no specific or general traits even if there are stereotypes.If the word queer has come to denote the exploration of categories of gender and sexuality that is rapidly shaping 21st Century gender politics, then this brings into question how far concepts of male and female are applicable. Whether gender is innate, and how reclaiming queer identity is consistent with an anarchist-communist understanding of gender, sexual identity and capitalist distortions of reality.Ann Oakley stated that ‘Gender is a matter of culture. It refers to the social classifications “masculine” and “feminine”‘ if this is true, then it would imply that gender is a social construct, relative and applicable only to a given culture. If this is taken as correct then it validates queer identity, which suggests that binaries of male and female offer a false dichotomy insofar as the norms, values and traits identified with these labels are perpetually passing into one another. There are a variety of examples to illustrate gender then, as a social constructStereotypes of males and females would have us believe one cannot be gender-blind, and that everyone is born into a gender. This however would imply that the mind is gendered, that the brain is an organ of sex. This we know not to be true. So what would define gender? Clothes perhaps, or genitalia? Where does one shave or maybe one’s feelings on the colour pink? Gender is meant to represent both physical and psychological attributes which is expected by a given culture. This manifests itself most notably in modern stereotypes of males as strong, honourable and having integrity and females as caring, vulnerable and shy. But just as anarchism is a philosophy that rejects the confines of capitalist society, queer theory questions the validity of gendered roles and stereotypes. Such stereotypes of gender show that the concepts of male and female exist only in their differentiation from the other and are therefore open to critical analysis.This is not to suggest that gender is irrelevant in the here and now, on the contrary, gender is indeed relevant to many people and the belief that gender and sexuality are fluid concepts in no way invalidates the identity of those who define contently with binaries of gender and sexual orientation. But as anarchists, we want a society where differentiation between people based solely on who they sleep with, the genitalia they were born with or how well they fit stereotypes isn’t a concern. We view queer theory as a contemporary understanding of what the society we envisage will look like.If gender and sexuality are a social construction then, we as anarchist communists can offer an explanation as to why this is so, who seeks to benefit from the gender binary and provide a radical critique of rigid sexuality.Queer-anarchism is a happy marriage of two philosophies that break down barriers in pursuit of freedom and liberation. As both anarchist-communists and as individuals oppressed by the larger heteronormative culture we believe that coming outside of sexual and gender binaries is inherently political; we recognise that the confines of sex, sexuality and gender are mere labels that treat individuals as nothing more than part of as easily defined homogeneous grouping; without an identity of their own. This is just not the reality. Moreover, we realise that our rulers seek to gain from the enforcement of gender and sexual binaries upon us and that our fight against sexual restriction is a fight against the very people who maintain it.Anarchist-Communists view the existing society then as conservative, patriarchal and heteronormative not as an incidental occurrence, but shaped as such by those who wish to maintain power for the few not the many. We know that sexual liberation cannot and will not be fulfilled under capitalist society, the bourgeoisie can not meet this demand, we therefore view the logical consequence of gender and sexual liberation as anti-capitalism.Capitalism constantly teaches us that our affairs must be regulated, that we must be ruled wisely and accept authority. To accept authority however and to be accepting of the ruling class’s rule requires a docile workforce exhausted of class-consciousness, one way in which this is achieved involves the labelling of our genders and even sexual preferences, dividing us into set groups. Furthermore, we believe that the market (the world of commercial activity where goods and services are bought and sold) isn’t, as some Marxists assume, an abstract and amoral mechanism – insofar as it consciously needs to target particular sections of society to purchase the goods made to produce the lifeblood of the market – capital. Gender enforcement (and sometimes segregation) then isn’t just a way to fragment society further, but also a necessary market-driven phenomenon that needs to sell products and ideas to ‘men’ and ‘women’ differently. The consequence of this is a society where gender expression and experimentation are frowned upon unless it is consistent with the gender assigned at birth; a society where those who are not attracted exclusively to others who are differently gender-assigned are thought of as deviant.Why then is it in the interests of our bosses and the state to enforce gender roles when they are so evidently not applicable to all, are incorrect in their generalisations, and cause division? To ask that question is to answer it… Imagine the political potential of a unified working class; united in their exploitation and desire to end the monotony of work and life under capitalism, this is not an easy task in a society fragmented along so many different lines. But in our division, lies our weakness and it is no accident! A united working class consisting of workers united in pursuit of freedom from the confines of a homophobic, violent and exploitative society is of course capitalism’s greatest threat. The response of the capitalist class then, is to divide and rule; setting male against female, heterosexual against homosexual etc.Anarchists envisage a different society, where social and personal identity are individual concerns and artistic and sexual expression are not regulated. We don’t want a society where you have to choose to be consciously masculine or feminine, we don’t appreciate a society that fetishises ‘male’ dominance and presumes a norm of violence and aggression. Whatever your self-defined gender identity, we all seek a world where how you dress, the people you sleep with and the genitalia you possess do not embody who you are, we feel that the fight for a better world necessitates the overthrow of the very system that perpetuates gender myths and heterosexual supremacy. Sexual freedom will only be achieved in the pursuit of freedom for all, and not just freedom for our rulers and our bosses!So queer identity is compatible with our understanding of a better world in that queer theory is the adoption of the attitudes of what we hope a post-revolutionary society will manifest itself as in the here and now. Our job as revolutionaries is to embrace this but to bring that argument of gender and sexual identity as fluid to the conclusion of anti-capitalism and anti-statism.First published in 2009 by the Anarchist FederationWe hope you enjoyed that free preview. The Extreme Lit-Review is exclusively funded by our readers. If you would like to listen to the full episode and support our work, then please subscribe below.We hope you find value in the Extreme Lit-Review and believe in our mission. We are exclusively funded by you, the reader. If you believe more people need to hear this information, then you can gift a subscription today. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.extremelitreview.com/subscribe
    --------  
    11:25

More Education podcasts

About Extreme-Lit Review

Dive into the underbelly of the extreme elements of the political and cultural domains with Kieran White, a seasoned journalist with nearly 20 years of experience. Explore the covert operations of militants and agitators shaping our world from the shadows. www.extremelitreview.com
Podcast website

Listen to Extreme-Lit Review, Bad Bridget and many other podcasts from around the world with the radio.net app

Get the free radio.net app

  • Stations and podcasts to bookmark
  • Stream via Wi-Fi or Bluetooth
  • Supports Carplay & Android Auto
  • Many other app features
Social
v7.23.11 | © 2007-2025 radio.de GmbH
Generated: 11/15/2025 - 2:44:51 PM