Mendelspod Podcast

As sequencing continues to become cheaper, more attention is being paid to sample prep. Today we’re following up with the company, Volta Labs, a genomics applications company transforming sample prep for NGS by increasing robustness and precision, and lowering operating costs. CEO Udayan Umapathi reflects on what has been a breakout first commercial year for Callisto, the company’s sequencer-agnostic, digital-fluidics platform for sample prep. When he was last on the show, Callisto had just launched. One year later, it is deployed across North America, Europe, and Asia, with rapid uptake in clinical labs, pediatric oncology centers, and high-throughput sequencing sites.Udayan says the scale of adoption surprised even the team. “We said we wanted to be the front end of every sequencing technology. We’ve actually done that,” he notes, adding that more than ten applications now support short- and long-read sequencing.What’s driving the momentum? Three things keep coming up from customers: true walk-away automation, the ability to run any chemistry on any sequencer, and major improvements in quality and cost. Labs without automation engineers can now “simply buy a kit and run software…without having to learn sample prep,” Udayan explains.A standout story this year has been pediatric oncology, where whole-genome sequencing and hybrid-capture workflows have shown strong performance on Callisto. Customers such as Prinses Máxima Center and UMC Utrecht are using the platform across Illumina, Oxford Nanopore, Ultima, and other chemistries, achieving the sequencer-agnostic vision Volta set out from the start.Looking ahead, Udayan sees sequencing as still early in its evolution and believes sample prep has vast room for innovation. “One platform to do Illumina, one platform to do Oxford Nanopore, one platform to do Ultima… long read, short read—we do it all,” he says. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.mendelspod.com/subscribe

Few startups have launched with such quiet anticipation—or such a remarkable founding pedigree—as Cellanome. Backed by veterans of the genomics revolution, the company aims to do for cell biology what Illumina did for sequencing: make it measurable, dynamic, and multidimensional.In this debut conversation, Cellanome CEO Omead Ostadan traces his path from the early days of Applied Biosystems and Solexa to what he calls “the multi-omics of the cell.” He describes a breakthrough platform capable of observing living cells in real time, combining imaging, molecular analysis, and computation in ways that bring biology closer than ever to its native state.“Our hypothesis,” says Ostadan, “is that you are now creating an environment that most resembles the natural environment in which these cells operate. Anything you’re measuring is much more likely to resemble what you’re going to see in real biology.”Using what the company calls CellCage technology, the Cellanome R3200 system can isolate and sustain thousands of living cells or co-cultures—neurons with microglia, for instance—allowing researchers to track interactions, responses, and phenotypic changes over time. Ostadan believes this kind of structured, longitudinal, multimodal data will be foundational for the next generation of AI-driven biological models.“The next leap in biology,” he says, “requires a fundamentally different mode of data. That has been our focus from the start—to generate data that most closely resembles what’s happening at the foundational basis of biology across all organisms.”Now in full commercialization, Cellanome has multiple units installed in the U.S. and preparing for expansion into Europe and Asia. For Ostadan, who has helped bring multiple life-science platforms to market, this moment feels singular: “I’ve never been as excited about the potential of a technology as I am about what we have at Cellanome,” he says. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.mendelspod.com/subscribe

At the end of each year we look for a guest who in many ways defines the year. Today we sit down former NHGRI director Eric Green to reflect on the most turbulent year in his 31-year career at NIH. After leading the National Human Genome Research Institute for more than 15 years, Green’s appointment was abruptly non-renewed—a decision he learned about with “two or three days notice that I was going to have to retire from federal service.” What followed, he says, was a wave of terminations and forced retirements across NIH that left NHGRI “in trauma” as entire communications, education, and policy groups disappeared overnight.Yet alongside this institutional upheaval, Green describes a scientific landscape moving at astonishing speed—from the maturation of genome editing and long-read sequencing to the rise of multi-omics and the accelerating push toward routine healthy newborn genome sequencing. He believes widespread newborn sequencing is no longer a distant vision but “within striking distance,” driven by global studies, new U.S. programs, and rapidly falling costs.The conversation also explores the political pressures shaping genomics today, especially around the collection of heterogeneous genomic data and the cultivation of a diverse workforce. Green argues that scientists must learn to explain their work in human terms—as stories about patients and cures, not grants and budgets. He says it might also be a good idea to not use the “d” word (for example, “assortment” rather than “diversity”) in grants for now, silly as that is.Despite the personal and institutional losses of the past year, Green remains committed to the future of U.S. biomedical science which continues to surge in the headlines each day. In a reference to Dickens, he says it is literally the best and worst of times.Now entering what he calls “version 3.0,” Green sees his role as genomics evangelist, educator, and advocate—helping ensure that the momentum of genomic medicine continues even as the nation’s scientific infrastructure undergoes profound stress.“I am officially on call to help rebuild the NIH… It’s very easy to destroy a place, and very hard to rebuild it.” This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.mendelspod.com/subscribe

Note: This show was originally published on September 11, 2025. In light of the recent acquisition of Foresight Diagnostics by Natera, we’re re-publishing the interview with co-founders Jake Chabon and David Kurtz.Catching a cancer relapse before any scan could see it is the ultimate goal for minimal residual disease or MRD testing. And it’s the promise behind Foresight Diagnostics, a Stanford spin-out co-founded by scientist Jake Chabon and oncologist David Kurtz who say they have arrived at “next gen” MRD testing. In this debut interview, Jake and Dave walk us through their journey from academic research to launching one of the most sensitive MRD tests on the market—one that’s already shaped new NCCN guidelines.* 0:00 Origin story* 4:45 What makes this “next gen?”* 10:15 How do you get the leap in sensitivity* 15:45 Already had an impact on NCCN guidelines* 23:00 Launching lymphoma texting next year, then on to solid tumors* 28:00 How will this change standard of care?Jake explains how their novel PhasED-Seq technology, which tracks “phased variants”—usually two or three mutations on the same DNA molecule—enables unprecedented sensitivity, detecting cancer cells at levels as low as one part in 10 million. “It’s extremely unlikely to have two concurrent sequencing errors,” says Jake. “That’s functionally the core insight here.”For Dave, who still treats lymphoma patients, the clinical need is personal. “Our goal is to treat patients until there are no more cancer cells in the body. So having a tool that tells you when there are no more cancer cells left is kind of our holy grail.”Their MRD test, called Foresight CLARITY, launches first for lymphoma next year, with solid tumor applications in development. As their data have already begun to reshape the standard of care, Jake and Dave discuss a future in which MRD testing could come before PET scans—or even replace them.“We want MRD testing to become the standard of care across all cancers treated with curative intent,” says Jake. With Foresight CLARITY already in three prospective trials and in NCCN guidelines, and a clear clinical need, that vision may not be far off. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.mendelspod.com/subscribe

This week on Mendelspod, we speak with Petter Brodin, Professor of Pediatric Immunology at the Karolinska Institutet and Director of Systems Immunology at Imperial College London, about his pioneering work in childhood immune development and his new spatial-proteomics investigations into lupus.Petter shares how a single lecture on natural killer cells pulled him into immunology, and how early twin studies convinced him that “our immune systems are shaped predominantly by non-heritable factors.” That insight drove him to study the earliest stages of immune development—when newborns leave a sterile environment for a microbial world that imprints their immune trajectories for life.A major theme of the conversation is Petter’s insistence that immune responses cannot be understood by looking at cells one by one. As he puts it: “Cells don’t ever work in isolation, but historically we’ve always been studying them in isolation—and I think that’s fundamentally problematic.”This systems view is now being partly enabled by Pixelgen’s spatial interactomics. Using their Proximity Network Assay, Petter’s group is finding that lupus B cells don’t just differ in protein expression—they differ in protein distribution, revealing organization patterns that classical flow cytometry cannot capture.These spatial signatures may point directly to new, more precise therapies. Petter explains: “If there is a difference in protein–protein interaction or protein distribution that characterizes disease, then surely that indicates a dysregulation—and that is something we can target.” Instead of broad immunosuppression or depleting whole cell populations, future treatments could focus on the exact cell states driving autoimmunity.Petter ends on an optimistic note: spatial interactomics won’t just help treat autoimmune disease—it may allow us to intervene earlier, even preventatively, as we learn how early-life immune disturbances set the stage for disease decades later. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.mendelspod.com/subscribe