Press On Journal

This article explores the practicality of trusting in God even though we cannot see the end from the beginning. There is freedom in realizing that God is more interested in who we are rather than what we do. Jesus trusted in his Father implicitly, and he is inviting us to share our journey with him as our compassionate and capable leader and to realize that the process of becoming more like Him is forged through our daily, small decisions.

The authors of the Gospels and epistles routinely appeal to Israel’s Scriptures, not merely as historical background or for moral instruction, but as the theological and narrative framework within which the significance of Christ must be understood. This is not a matter of isolated proof-texting, but of reading the OT as a divinely orchestrated narrative that finds its culmination in Jesus. This article identifies some of the methods they used to show that the story of Israel reached its climax in Christ.

Using a historical perspective, this article considers how Christadelphians ‘fit’ in the broad sweep of Christian history by addressing the background to Christadelphian beliefs, with reflections on different understandings of what a ‘church’ is, examples of movements seeking to reform or break away from the established church, and accounts of communities which shared aspects of Christadelphian beliefs including believer’s baptism and non-Trinitarian understandings of God.

Using personal experience as a starting point, this article explores the process of faith deconstruction and reconstruction within the Christadelphian community. It examines how foundational beliefs about biblical inerrancy can become entangled with personal identity and the need for certainty, and what happens when those foundations no longer hold. Drawing on Heschel's philosophy of sacred time and Girard's mimetic theory, the article develops a mirror metaphor: we see distorted reflections of ourselves through culture and ego, but God's loving gaze reveals our true image. The result is a faith rebuilt on the teachings of Jesus rather than doctrines about scripture, emphasizing transformation over transaction.

This article looks at the genealogies of Jesus recorded in the gospels of Matthew and Luke, and provides insights into why these two lists of ancestors differs. Matthew and Luke had very different purposes in collating the genealogical history of Jesus. Matthew shows that Jesus has far greater honour and acclaim as Son of God than as son of David. Luke elaborates Jesus’ distinguished lineage: divine, royal, and priestly. The article ends with Paul’s use of genealogies to emphasize that we are all called to be adopted children of God: legally eligible to participate in our Father’s inheritance.