Diddy's Team Blast Adria English As They Move To Deny Her Another Extension
This filing, submitted on behalf of Sean Combs and his co-defendants in the case English v. Combs et al., opposes the plaintiff’s renewed request for a 60-day extension to secure a third set of legal counsel. The defense argues that the plaintiff has already cycled through two legal teams—both of whom withdrew due to serious breakdowns in the attorney-client relationship, including what they described as “self-destructive conduct,” refusal to follow legal advice, and irreconcilable differences. The filing outlines a timeline of delays and extensions already granted, emphasizing that the plaintiff’s behavior has repeatedly stalled progress and wasted the court’s and defendants’ time and resources.The defendants urge the court to deny any further delay, asserting that the plaintiff’s complaint is fatally flawed and that she is unlikely to retain new counsel willing to continue litigating what they call “baseless claims.” They argue that granting another extension would prolong an already mismanaged case that has made little progress nearly a year after being filed. Moreover, the defense indicates it is prepared to file a motion to dismiss all eight of the plaintiff’s claims with prejudice and warns that continued adjournments serve only to avoid scrutiny of the case’s legal shortcomings. Ultimately, the defense calls for the case to move forward without further delay, with or without new representation for the plaintiff.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.624352.74.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
--------
9:49
Diddy Trial: The Feds Respond To Diddy's Motion To Strike The Testimony Of Dawn Hughes (Part 2) (5/31/25)
In this filing, the government strongly opposes Sean Combs’s motion to strike the expert testimony of Dr. Dawn Hughes, a clinical and forensic psychologist who previously took the stand. The government argues that the defense’s request is both untimely and baseless, noting it was filed three days after Dr. Hughes had already testified. The prosecution contends that Dr. Hughes's testimony was properly admitted after thorough litigation and judicial review, and that the court had already placed clear boundaries on what her expert analysis could include.The government further asserts that Combs’s arguments lack legal merit and ignore prior court rulings that carefully delineated the scope of Dr. Hughes’s expert contributions. They describe the defense’s motion as an effort to relitigate settled matters without presenting new or compelling justification. As such, the government urges the court to reject the motion to strike and allow Dr. Hughes’s testimony to remain part of the trial record, emphasizing its relevance and the court’s prior validation of its admissibility.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.372.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
--------
11:43
Diddy Trial: The Feds Respond To Diddy's Motion To Strike The Testimony Of Dawn Hughes (Part 1) (5/31/25)
In this filing, the government strongly opposes Sean Combs’s motion to strike the expert testimony of Dr. Dawn Hughes, a clinical and forensic psychologist who previously took the stand. The government argues that the defense’s request is both untimely and baseless, noting it was filed three days after Dr. Hughes had already testified. The prosecution contends that Dr. Hughes's testimony was properly admitted after thorough litigation and judicial review, and that the court had already placed clear boundaries on what her expert analysis could include.The government further asserts that Combs’s arguments lack legal merit and ignore prior court rulings that carefully delineated the scope of Dr. Hughes’s expert contributions. They describe the defense’s motion as an effort to relitigate settled matters without presenting new or compelling justification. As such, the government urges the court to reject the motion to strike and allow Dr. Hughes’s testimony to remain part of the trial record, emphasizing its relevance and the court’s prior validation of its admissibility.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.372.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
--------
11:22
Diddy Trial: The Defense Continues It's Cross Examination Of 'Mia' On Day 13 (Part 2) (5/31/25)
On the afternoon of Day 13 of Sean "Diddy" Combs's federal trial, "Mia," a former assistant testifying under a pseudonym, faced cross-examination by the defense. Combs's attorney, Brian Steel, presented jurors with Mia's past social media posts and a scrapbook she created for Combs's 45th birthday, which included affectionate messages like "I love you forever." Steel aimed to challenge Mia's allegations of abuse by highlighting these positive depictions of their relationship. Mia responded that these gestures were made under psychological duress, explaining that she was in a "very confusing" situation and feared for her safety, stating that creating the scrapbook was "a lot more complicated on all levels."Further questioning focused on Mia's emotional state after being dismissed from Combs's company in 2016. Text messages presented in court revealed her expressing feelings of devastation and heartbreak, describing her life as "over" and stating she was "going to kill" herself. Mia explained that working for Combs was her entire world, and the sudden loss left her feeling lost and betrayed. When asked directly whether she had fabricated any part of her testimony, Mia firmly stated, "What I said is true. I have not lied to anyone at all." The court adjourned for the day, with Mia's cross-examination set to continue on Monday.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:May 30, 2025 - Day 13 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs trial | CNNBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
--------
13:55
The War Over Diddy's Subpoena Of Cassie Ventura's Records Continues Behind The Scenes (5/31/25)
In this letter to Judge Subramanian, Sean Combs's legal team opposes a request made by Ms. Cassie Ventura to block a proposed Rule 17 subpoena that would compel her to produce certain documents. The defense argues that Ventura’s objections lack merit and that the subpoena is neither “unreasonable nor oppressive.” Instead, they maintain that the materials requested are relevant and potentially critical to Combs’s defense in the ongoing federal criminal case, which includes charges of sex trafficking and racketeering.The defense further contends that Ventura’s attempt to avoid producing these documents undermines the fairness of the legal process. They assert that the subpoena complies with procedural standards and is narrowly tailored to obtain specific information tied to Ventura’s claims and testimony. As such, the letter urges the Court to approve, or “so-order,” the subpoena, allowing the defense to access documents they believe may challenge Ventura’s credibility or support Combs’s case.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.370.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Jeffrey Epstein was a multi millionaire who had political and business ties to some of the most rich and powerful people in the world. From businessmen to politicians at the highest levels, Epstein broke bread with them all. Yet for years the Legacy media and the rest of high society looked the other way and ignored his behavior as multiple women came forward with allegations of abuse. Even after he was convicted and subsequently received a sweetheart deal those same so called elites welcomed him back with open arms. Now after his death and the arrest of Maxwell, the real story is starting to come together and the curtain has begun to be drawn back and what it has revealed is truly disturbing. From Princes to Ex Presidents, the cast of scoundrels in this play spans continents and political affiliations leaving us with a transcontinental criminal conspiracy possibly unlike any we have ever seen before. In this podcast we will explore all of the levels of Jeffrey Epstein and his criminal enterprise. From his most trusted assistants to obscure associates, we will leave no stone unturned as we swim through the muck searching for clarity and answers to some of the most pressing questions of the case. From interviews with people directly involved in the case to daily updates, the Epstein Chronicles will have it all. Just like our other project, The Jeffrey Epstein Show, you can expect no punches pulled and consistent content. We have covered the Epstein case daily(everyday since October 1st 2019) and will continue to do so until there are convictions. With a library of well over 1k shows, you can expect a ton of content coming your way including on scene reporting from the Maxwell trial and from places like Zorro Ranch. Thank you for tuning in and I look forward to having you all along for the ride.(Created and Hosted by Bobby Capucci)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Ireland