The Epstein Chronicles

Melinda French Gates has described her single meeting with Jeffrey Epstein in 2013 as deeply unsettling, stating that she “regretted it the second [she] walked in the door” and later referred to him as “evil personified.” She said the dinner at his Manhattan residence left her disturbed—uncomfortable with both the setting and her then-husband Bill’s decision to associate with Epstein. Her unease was so strong that she made her disapproval known directly to Bill, highlighting how Epstein’s presence and ties created significant tension in their marriage

Moreover, Melinda has indicated that Epstein’s involvement with Bill Gates became one of the contributing factors in her decision to seek a divorce after 27 years of marriage. In her memoir and past interviews, she has attributed part of the breakdown in their relationship to what she viewed as Bill’s ill-advised meetings and connection with Epstein. The public resurgence of her comments—calling Epstein abhorrent and acknowledging how the revelations caused nightmares—has underscored her continuing disapproval of that association.

to contact me:

[email protected]

To contact me:

[email protected]

source:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10573431/Melinda-Gates-slams-Bills-friendship-pedophile-Jeffrey-Epstein-CBS-interview.html

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Rumors and reporting that circulate about Ghislaine Maxwell’s role in introducing Prince Andrew to Jeffrey Epstein stem from the close personal relationships all three shared in the early-to-mid 1990s. Maxwell, the British socialite daughter of media magnate Robert Maxwell, was widely described in media and investigative accounts as one of Epstein’s closest associates and key recruiters, particularly of young women into Epstein’s social and sexual orbit. According to numerous reports, Maxwell and Prince Andrew moved in overlapping social circles in London and the U.K. elite world in the 1990s and early 2000s, and it was through this environment that Maxwell is said to have facilitated the initial meeting between the prince and Epstein. Many accounts suggest that Maxwell served as the social connector — hosting dinners, introducing high-profile contacts, and effectively “vouching” for Epstein within aristocratic and wealthy British networks — which eventually led to Epstein and Prince Andrew becoming acquaintances, and later, associates. These narratives are based on journalistic investigations, books, and recountings by those familiar with the trio’s social milieu, though they remain in the realm of reported claims rather than independently verified fact.

Once Prince Andrew and Epstein were introduced, their relationship became a subject of intense scrutiny. The prince was photographed with Epstein and Maxwell on multiple occasions, and he stayed at Epstein’s properties, including his New York townhouse and private island, engagements that fueled ongoing public and legal attention. Maxwell’s central role in Epstein’s network — both social and operational — made her a key figure in speculation about how Epstein cultivated powerful friends, with many observers pointing to her as the linchpin connecting Epstein to circles that might otherwise have kept their distance.

to contact me:

[email protected]

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Bill Clinton’s repeated use of Jeffrey Epstein’s private jet remains one of the most glaring and troubling aspects of their association, undercutting every attempt by the former president to minimize the depth of their relationship. Flight logs reveal that Clinton flew on Epstein’s plane dozens of times, traveling to destinations across the globe under the guise of humanitarian work tied to the Clinton Foundation. Yet the sheer number of trips—some of them occurring without Secret Service protection—raises uncomfortable questions about what, exactly, Clinton was doing on these flights and why secrecy seemed necessary. Reports that Clinton was such a frequent passenger that he even had a preferred seat on the plane only reinforce the impression that this was not a casual or incidental relationship, but a sustained and comfortable arrangement. For a man of Clinton’s stature and experience, the defense that he simply didn’t know who he was associating with strains credibility to the breaking point.

to contact me:

[email protected]

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jeffrey Epstein rarely did anything that wasn't part of the bigger picture. Choosing to build a palatial like dwelling In New Mexico most certainly fit the bill. A place where he was insulated by friends in high places and where his money went the extra mile, in this episode we take a look at Jeffrey Epstein and hustle he pulled in New Mexico.

to contact me:

[email protected]

source:

https://www.santafenewmexican.com/opinion/local_columns/tax-records-show-jeffrey-epsteins-power-influence/article_941610ac-831f-11ea-ba4b-fb874ada3017.html

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In the Broward County defamation litigation CACE 15-000072, the deposition at issue is sworn testimony from Paul Cassell, one of the attorneys representing Epstein survivors and a former federal judge. Cassell’s deposition focuses on his role in challenging the 2008 federal Non-Prosecution Agreement granted to Jeffrey Epstein, and on statements he made publicly about Alan Dershowitz that later became the basis for Dershowitz’s defamation claims. Cassell explains the factual foundation for his remarks, emphasizing that they were rooted in court filings, sworn victim testimony, investigative reporting, and contemporaneous evidence. He details how survivors’ allegations against Dershowitz emerged, how they were evaluated by legal teams, and why he believed it was appropriate and accurate to reference them in public advocacy surrounding Epstein’s secret plea deal. Cassell consistently frames his conduct as part of his duty to represent victims and expose prosecutorial misconduct, not as a personal attack.

The deposition also addresses Dershowitz’s accusation that Cassell acted recklessly or with malice, which Cassell firmly rejects. He testifies that he never fabricated claims, never coached witnesses to lie, and never acted outside ethical or professional boundaries. Cassell underscores that his statements reflected allegations already made under oath by victims and contained in legal records, and that suppressing discussion of those allegations would further harm survivors. Throughout the testimony, Cassell situates the dispute within the larger Epstein cover-up, arguing that the real issue is not reputational discomfort among the powerful but the systemic failure to protect exploited minors. The deposition ultimately functions as a defense of victim-centered advocacy and transparency, directly countering Dershowitz’s narrative that survivor allegations were invented, coerced, or irresponsibly amplified.

to contact me:

EFTA00594390.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.