The Learning Development Project

• Lily Abadal: the value of slow thinking

  The eruption of generative AI into higher education prompted many educators, worried about the integrity of their courses (and the personal integrity of their students), to redesign their assessments, rejecting essays and other long-form pieces of writing in favour of ‘AI-proof’ reflective pieces or so-called authentic assessment formats instead. Lily Abadal, in contrast, believes not only that writing has deep implicit value in learning, but that it can be meaningfully achieved in a way that circumvents the temptations of AI. Engaging in a topic in depth, mulling over an issue, considering an argument, and then sitting with the discomfort of not having a clear and quick answer can all be difficult and uncomfortable. By learning how to think slowly and deeply, students come to understand that the discomfort is itself a sign of learning; designing these opportunities out serves no one. When we slow down, when we look for the meaning beyond the output, we can reconnect with our thought processes and relish the pleasure of learning. The resources we mentionedAbadal, L.M. (2025) Only the Humanities can save the university from AI. Public Discourse, 21 July. Available from: https://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2025/07/98429/ Lily’s website: https://www.drlilyabadal.com/ Hadot, P. (1995). Philosophy as a Way of Life: Spiritual Exercises from Socrates to Foucault. Wiley-Blackwell.James Lang’s articles on The Chronicle of Higher Education. Pascal’s WagerStrunk, W. and White, E.B. (1999) The Elements of Style (4th ed.). Pearson.Syska, A. (2025). We tried to kill the essay - now let’s resurrect it. The LSE Blog, 27 February. Available from: https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/highereducation/2025/02/27/we-tried-to-kill-the-essay-now-lets-resurrect-it/ And the publications we talked aboutAbadal, L.M. (2025) Drafted: A Workbook for Slow Thinking in the Age of AI. Available from: https://www.drlilyabadal.com/drafted-workbook.html Abadal, L.M. (2024) 'Ensuring genuine assessment in philosophy education: strategies for scaffolding writing assessment in an LLM era', Teaching Philosophy, 47(1), pp. 143-165. doi: 10.5840/teachphil2024422195.

  --------  

  1:00:11

  --------

  1:00:11
• Carina Buckley and Alicja Syska: writing as anchor

  We’ve been thinking about the connections between professional identity and writing in the context of third space for a few years now, and it seems ever more pertinent in these times of uncertainty, transition and change. We see colleagues change roles or leave academia, not always of their own volition, and we experience it ourselves. With change inevitably comes loss, but some of the things we have been thinking and writing about might be of use in this turbulent context. Writing for publication acts as an anchor for identity, a trail of breadcrumbs of our thoughts and of who we were when we committed them to posterity, and writing in third space in particular can be an act of resistance: to the crush of loss, to the absence of identity, to the fear of transition. By choosing what we write, how we write it, and where we publish, we create ourselves again and again in our writing. No matter our role or where change might take us, our writing remains a way for us to hold onto who, at heart, we are. The resources we mentionedThe Third Space SymposiumOur Slowposium padletAnd the article we talked aboutBuckley, C., Syska, A. and Heggie, L. (2024) ‘Grounded in liquidity: writing and identity in third space’. London Review of Education, 22 (1), 26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14324/LRE.22.1.26.

  --------  

  1:01:44

  --------

  1:01:44
• Sandra Abegglen: collaboration for social justice

  Sandra's secrets of collaboration:Openness to the experience and what it bringsRecognition of our human nature and the need for being with otherWe can - and must? - make time and space for each other. Hold onto the in-between spaces where we can come together; create meetings without agendas, where things can emerge.Collaboration is more than simply working with others. It’s more, even, than working successfully with others. It is, rather, a direct pathway towards social justice through its absolute commitment to equality. Universities therefore have a social obligation to do collaboration well, both internally and with external partners, which means raising up marginalised voices and dismantling power relationships. Our students need to experience positive learning experiences with other people. There are undoubtedly challenges: working to a deadline (and bringing others along to it); ensuring space for everyone to contribute; being conscious of our own bias and preconceptions. But these are all within our gift. Reclaim your agency! That way true collaboration lies. If you would like to explore what this means with Sandra, this is your invitation to reach out and have a conversation. The resources we mentionedDevisch, I. (2006). The Sense of Being(-) with Jean-Luc Nancy. Culture Machine vol. 8. Available at: https://culturemachine.net/community/the-sense-of-being/ Robertson, N. S. and Neuhaus, F. (2024). The asocial society and urban form in Canada: A scoping study. Canadian Journal of Urban Research 33(1)And the books we talked aboutAbegglen, S., Burns, T., Heller, R., Madhok, R., Neuhaus, F., Sinfield, S. and Gitanjali Singh, U.  (Eds.) (2025) Stories of hope: Reimagining education. Open Book Publishers. Available at: https://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0462 Abegglen, S., Burns, T. & Sinfield, S. (Eds.) (2023). Higher education collaboration: A new ecology of practice. Bloomsbury.

  --------  

  54:55

  --------

  54:55
• Karen Gravett: the value of care

  What matters to us and what do we value? These are two key questions posed by Karen Gravett as she explores ideas around relational pedagogies and mattering and how they can contribute to creating a more caring university. In a neoliberal HE context laden with metrics-driven performativity, the call to care can feel like another layer of emotional labour, one disproportionately carried by women. Indeed, when the notion of care generally is seen as ‘women’s work’, how can it become part of a system that is overwhelmingly structured and gendered in ways that make it seem impossible? The first step is to critique ideas of care itself, in this context: it is not about happiness or pleasing or affection, but rather more nuanced, complex, ambivalent, and relational. Then we can aim to respond positively to the material challenges: to look beyond broad brush solutions and instead focus at the microlevel, on small changes and ways of relating and engaging that make a difference. The resources we mentionedGravett, K. (2023) Relational pedagogies: Connections and mattering in higher education. Bloomsbury.Gravett, K. (2025) Critical practice in higher education. Bloomsbury.Heron, M., Gravett, K., and Yakovchuk, N. (2020). Publishing and flourishing: writing for desire in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 40(3), 538–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1773770 Elizabeth Adams St. Pierre professional profileWoolf, V. (1929/2002) A room of one’s own. Penguin.And the article we talked aboutGravett, K., Taylor, C.A. and Fairchild, N. (2024) Pedagogies of mattering: re-conceptualising relational pedagogies in higher education, Teaching in Higher Education, 29:2, 388-403, DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2021.1989580

  --------  

  53:57

  --------

  53:57
• Rebecca Lindner and Martin Compton: liberating learning

  What does it mean to liberate learning? Who is doing the liberating, and what do we think someone being liberated from? For Becky Lindner and Martin Compton, the answer to the first question is essentially to find, nurture, and celebrate the inherent joy of learning and teaching. For fifty years (at least), as they point out, we have been having these conversations about rekindling joy and love of learning, which, if nothing else, signals that we have been uncomfortable with some of the absurdities, constraints, and expectations of contemporary higher education for a long time. Yet that sense of hope continues to drive us forward, looking for ‘care-full’ ways of bringing our students and colleagues along with us. And that brings us to the second question: we must be our own liberators. Our role is to enable to liberation of the university by acting with compassion, equity, and humanity, through collaboration, co-creation, and curiosity, one small step at a time. The resources we mentionedOliver Burkeman (n.d.). The imperfectionist: Seventy per cent. Available from https://ckarchive.com/b/wvu2hghk5m82zf9r552rqtn34kzxxc8 Kerri-lee Krause (2023). Learner centred leadership in higher education: A practical guide. RoutledgeChoose your own impenetrable writer to inversely learn from!And the issue we talked aboutCompton, M. and Lindner, R. (2025) Liberating learning in the empathetic university, Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 35. Available at: https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi35.1576.

  --------  

  1:15:20

  --------

  1:15:20

More Education podcasts

Trending Education podcasts

About The Learning Development Project