Movie of the Year

Movie of the Year: Best of the Year 2025
Century of the Year
A 2025 Year in Review in Real Time
Every year tells a story — but rarely this fast.
In this special episode of Movie of the Year, the panel presents 2025 – Century of the Year, a bold and chaotic 2025 year in review that attempts something simple, ambitious, and wildly entertaining: 100 of the biggest moments of the year, discussed in just 100 minutes.
This isn’t a countdown.
It isn’t a competition.
It’s a real-time replay of the year as it unfolded.
If you’re looking for a 2025 year-in-review podcast that values memory over rankings and chaos over consensus, this episode delivers.
What This 2025 Year in Review Covers
Across 100 minutes, the episode touches on a wide range of moments that defined the year, including:
major film releases and pop-culture events
TV moments that dominated conversation
internet and media chaos
stories that felt huge in the moment
robot chickens

The goal isn’t to judge what mattered most — it’s to remember what actually happened, when it happened.
The Format: 100 Moments, 100 Minutes
Unlike traditional year-end lists, Century of the Year moves chronologically, creating a true 2025 year in review rather than a retrospective ranking.
Each moment gets:
one minute
one burst of conversation
One chance to capture why it mattered then

January flows into February, February into March, and suddenly the year is racing by. The format mirrors how 2025 actually felt: relentless, noisy, and impossible to fully process in real time.
Who’s on the Mic
To keep pace with the format, Movie of the Year brings together a full PopFilter lineup:
Greg
Mike
Ryan
Cassie, host of The Superhero Show Show
Katelynn
Mackenna

With six voices rotating through the moments, the episode becomes a rolling conversation — jokes collide with reflection, and no one has time to overthink. The result is a loose, funny, and surprisingly emotional 2025 year-in-review podcast.
Why Century of the Year Is a 2025 Year in Review Unlike Any Other
There are no winners.
No awards.
No arguments to settle.
Instead, this episode leans into playful chaos. One minute forces instinct. Tangents get cut short. Opinions are stated boldly and sometimes abandoned just as quickly. That’s not a flaw —...

Movie of the Year: Best of the Year 2025
The Mixtape
The 2025 Mixtape as a Time Capsule
Every year leaves behind more than movies — it leaves a sound.
In this episode of Movie of the Year, the Taste Buds come together to create the 2025 Mixtape, a curated playlist designed to capture what the year felt like through music. Rather than ranking songs or chasing chart placement, the panel builds a living soundtrack that reflects the moods, moments, and cultural undercurrents of 2025.
The goal of the 2025 Mixtape isn’t consensus.
It’s memory.
What the 2025 Mixtape Is (and Is Not)
The 2025 Mixtape isn’t about declaring “the best songs of the year” in isolation. It’s about sequencing, contrast, and flow — how songs interact when placed side by side, how energy builds or collapses, and how a playlist can tell a story.
This episode explores questions like:
What song opens the year?
Where does the emotional peak land?
When does the mixtape need to slow down?
And what track closes the door on 2025?

The playlist is treated as a narrative, not a ranking.
Choosing Songs That Define 2025
As selections are made, the panel debates what qualifies a song for inclusion on the 2025 Mixtape. Is it cultural impact? Longevity? Personal obsession? Or the ability to instantly transport listeners back to a specific moment in the year?
The conversation weighs:
singles versus deep cuts
mainstream hits versus discoveries
songs that grew over time versus immediate standouts

Together, the picks form a portrait of how music functioned in daily life throughout 2025.
Genre, Mood, and the Shape of the Year
One of the episode’s central tensions is the extent to which the musical landscape of 2025 is truly diverse. The 2025 Mixtape moves across genres, tones, and emotional registers, reflecting a year that resisted easy categorization.
The discussion touches on:
pop’s evolving extremes
hip-hop’s shifting center
Indie music’s changing role
genre-blurring experimentation
and songs that moved from background noise to personal anthems

The result is a playlist that mirrors the year’s complexity rather than flattening it.
Flow Matters: Sequencing the 2025 Mixtape
More than any single song, sequencing becomes the battleground. A great track can still feel wrong if it breaks momentum or disrupts the mood. The panel debates transitions, tonal shifts, and the extent to which a listener can handle emotional whiplash.
This is where the episode gets deeply nerdy — and deeply satisfying.
The 2025 Mixtape isn’t just assembled.
It’s designed.
Why the 2025 Mixtape Matters
Years blur together.
Playlists don’t.
The 2025 Mixtape

Movie of the Year: Best of the Year 2025
Best Horror Movie of the Year
2025 Horror Movies and the Fight to Crown a Champion
The world of 2025 horror movies is a battlefield, and in this episode of Movie of the Year, Mike, Ryan, and Taylor wage war over which film deserves to stand above the rest. Instead of assembling a list or reading off favorites, the panel builds a brutal bracket to determine the best horror movie of 2025 — from studio monsters to indie nightmares to streaming shocks.
This isn’t just a celebration — it’s a confrontation.
Sixteen titles enter.
One claims the crown.
What Horror Means in 2025: Defining the Genre
Before the eliminations begin, the panel confronts the evolution of horror in 2025.
Is horror now:
a metaphor for social collapse?
a space for spiritual terror?
a conduit for bodily dread?
Or simply the movie that makes your heart race and palms sweat?

2025 horror movies refuse to stay in one lane.
The conversation traces how audiences now crave:
original horror films over sequels
daring stylistic swings
unpredictable stories
atmosphere over explanation
new monsters and mythologies

This episode takes seriously the project of defining what horror in 2025 feels like.
The 16 Films Competing for Best Horror Movie of 2025
This year’s bracket includes a mix of theatrical releases, streaming originals, and buzzy festival darlings hoping to break through.
The contenders for best horror film of 2025 include:
Sinners (religious terror with real teeth)
The Ugly Stepsister (fairy tale dread reimagined)
Good Boy, a streaming sleeper hit with claws
The Monkey, a Stephen King adaptation built for nightmares
Frankenstein, prestige monster cinema reborn
Death of a Unicorn, indie black magic meets satire
Bring Her Back, folk horror with bite
Wolf Man, classic creature feature updated
Weapons, conceptual terror from filmmakers pushing boundaries

The 2025 Season Begins with the Oscar Draft
Movie of the Year is back with a brand-new season, and there’s no better way to kick things off than with our first-ever Oscar Draft 2025. Hosted by Cassie, this episode sees panelists Ryan, Mike, Greg, and Taylor engage in a deadly serious competition to predict which films will dominate awards season.
Each drafter is tasked with assembling a roster of films they believe will rack up the most Academy Award nominations—across any and all categories—once Oscar morning finally arrives. It’s prediction, strategy, taste, and fortune-telling rolled into one.
The Taste Buds are back, and this time they’re playing for keeps.
Draft Rules: How the Oscar Draft 2025 Works
To ensure fairness—and maximize tension—the draft follows a snake format, meaning the order reverses each round.
Key Rules:
Drafters select movies, not individuals or categories
Any film is eligible—first half, festival darling, delayed release mystery, whatever
No two panelists can draft the same film
Five rounds total
The winning team is the one whose final slate earns the most nominations when the Academy announces them

Every pick is a bet—on the movies themselves, their campaigns, their distributors, their word of mouth, and even the voters’ unpredictable tastes.
Prediction vs Taste: Two Ways to Play
One wrinkle that defines the episode: panelists must decide what kind of drafter they want to be.
Do you swing for awards-season favorites blessed with early buzz?
Or gamble on late-breaking discoveries nobody else notices yet?
Some draft with spreadsheets and precedent. Others reach for films they want to see recognized. Every strategy has holes—and every smart pick someone else was eyeing can change the entire board.
Stakes, Tension, and Oscar Bloodsport
Unlike the usual Movie of the Year chaos, this one is deadly serious.
No bit is too small, no argument too granular, and no accusation too petty.
Ryan, Mike, Greg, and Taylor:
block each other’s picks
steal films out of sheer spite
argue over festival credibility
negotiate control of the board
and, occasionally, wonder if they’ve made a catastrophic mistake

With no immediate winner declared, the true victor won’t be revealed until Oscar nominations are announced.
Which makes the waiting—and the trash talk—that much sweeter.
Bonus Conversation: The State of the 2025 Race
Between picks, Cassie guides the panel through the critical questions that define this year’s awards landscape, including:
Are we preparing for a heavyweight Best Picture category?
Does streaming still have power?
Are studio campaign budgets shrinking—or...

Movie of the Year: 1971
The Devils
Why The Devils (1971) Still Provokes
In this episode of Movie of the Year, Ryan and Mike confront The Devils, Ken Russell’s incendiary historical drama that remains one of the most controversial films ever made. More than fifty years after its release, the film continues to shock and challenge audiences—not simply for its imagery, but for its ruthless examination of power and religion as intertwined systems of control.
Set in 17th-century France but unmistakably modern in its fury, this 1971 production exposes how institutions weaponize belief, morality, and fear. The conversation centers on why its reputation for scandal has so often eclipsed its intelligence, craft, and relevance.
Guest Spotlight: Brian Eggert of DeepFocusReview.com
Joining Ryan and Mike is special guest Brian Eggert, editor and lead writer at DeepFocusReview.com. Brian brings a historically grounded, analytical perspective that helps reframe the movie beyond its notoriety.
Brian discusses Ken Russell’s place in 1970s cinema, the long history of censorship surrounding the film, and why its critique of power and religion feels increasingly urgent today. His insight clarifies why this work endures not as shock cinema, but as a rigorously argued piece of political art.
Power and Religion as Systems of Control
At its core, this film is about power and religion—and how faith becomes an instrument of domination when fused with political authority. What begins as a case of alleged demonic possession in Loudon evolves into a portrait of institutional violence, where truth is irrelevant and spectacle is essential.
Ryan and Mike, with Brian’s input, analyze how religious authority operates alongside the state. Confessions are coerced, belief is staged, and punishment is public. Spiritual language masks political intent, turning faith into theater and theater into violence.
Russell and Jarman: Cinema Built to Confront
One of the most radical elements of the movie is the collaboration between Ken Russell and Derek Jarman. The pairing of Russell and Jarman produces a visual world that rejects period realism in favor of aggressive symbolism.
The episode breaks down how this partnership:
replaces historical authenticity with stark modernist design
uses white, brutalist architecture to deny comfort
transforms religious iconography into provocation
employs excess as both aesthetic strategy and political critique

This is not cinema designed to immerse—it is cinema designed to unsettle.
The Citizens of Loudon and Collective Responsibility
Beyond its powerful figures, the story is deeply concerned with the citizens of Loudon. Crowds gather, whisper, watch, and ultimately participate in the machinery of destruction.
Ryan and Mike explore how the film portrays moral panic as a communal process. Fear spreads socially. Violence becomes normalized. The narrative suggests that institutional cruelty only succeeds because ordinary people allow it to happen. The townspeople are not just victims of authority—they are active participants in its enforcement.
Sex, Blasphemy, and the Machinery of Scandal
Much of the controversy surrounding this work stems from its...