The AutSide Podcast

A threshold before Priced Out of Personhood—bridging When the Future Won’t Hold into the systems beneath it. If the last series named collapsed futurity, this one asks what made it material, and who profits when life becomes cost.
Before this next series begins, I wanted to stop here for a moment at the threshold between what I’ve just finished and what I’m about to begin.
Because I don’t think I’m done with When the Future Won’t Hold.
That series was never only about despair. It was about collapsed futurity—what it means to live in a world where the future no longer arrives as shelter, invitation, or recognisable shape. It was about what happens when there are no mirrors in which to see yourself becoming, and no windows through which to imagine a life that can actually hold.
But when I reached the end of that series, one question was still standing there waiting for me:
Not just what does this collapse feel like?But what produces it?
This video is a prelude to Priced Out of Personhood, the series that follows that question deeper.
If When the Future Won’t Hold explored the lived experience of withheld futurity, Priced Out of Personhood turns toward the machinery underneath it—the policies, institutions, economic logics, and moral vocabularies that make continuity increasingly fragile for so many of us. Housing, healthcare, education, disability support, debt, labour, and the broader cost of survival do not sit outside that collapse. They are often the conditions that produce it.
For autistic people, disabled people, poor people, trans people, carers, students, and anyone living inside permanent precarity, the future does not always fail to hold because we are pessimistic. Sometimes it fails to hold because the structures around us have been organised in ways that make continuity materially difficult. When care becomes conditional, support becomes negotiable, and human need is constantly translated into overhead, burden, or liability, the future contracts.
This next series begins there.
It asks what happens when a world becomes so organised around extraction that it can no longer recognise life outside the ledger. It asks how personhood itself becomes conditional on profitability, legibility, and compliance. And it asks what it means to refuse a system that counts us before it knows us.
If you’ve been with me through When the Future Won’t Hold, this is not a departure. It is the next layer of the same question.
We are not leaving the grief behind.We are following it into structure.


This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit autside.substack.com/subscribe

A closing reflection on collapse, grief, autistic futurity, and the lies we were sold about planning, stability, and success—ending not in despair, but in the stubborn work of building smaller, truer futures together.
This video closes When the Future Won’t Hold by naming what the series was really trying to do. I was never writing about uncertainty in the abstract. I was trying to speak to a condition many of us already live inside—especially autistic people, especially gestalt processors, especially those of us whose minds, bodies, and ways of knowing were never fully reflected by the world around us. What happens when the promises we were handed stop working? What happens when the future we were told to build cannot actually hold our labour, our needs, our truth, or our lives? This series has been my attempt to sit with those questions honestly—not to manufacture reassurance, but to clear enough space for a more honest kind of possibility.
Across these pieces, I have been trying to name something larger than personal anxiety. The collapse I am describing is not only emotional or internal. It is material, political, economic, and infrastructural. Wages stagnate whilst purchasing power collapses. The cost of reaching work becomes its own form of extraction. Housing, transport, insurance, food, schooling, medical care—every threshold now charges admission. Even the road becomes a toll booth. For autistic people, and particularly for those of us asked to survive inside systems that already misread us, this is not simply stress. It is the lived reality of being told to plan for futures that were never designed to include us in the first place.
There is also a deeper autistic grief running underneath the whole series. Not just that the future becomes hard to imagine, but that many of us were never given enough mirrors or windows to know what kind of future would actually fit. When the sanctioned script collapses, there may be no reliable replacement—no culturally approved pathway, no stable script, no inherited map. That absence has consequences. It leaves behind grief for lost timelines, for deferred recognition, for careers built on self-erasure, for institutions that promised safety and delivered sorting instead. Part of what these essays and recordings have been doing is making room for that grief without pretending it is the end of the story. We cannot build honestly on top of false promises and call it hope.
And yet this series is not about despair. It is about refusing counterfeit hope. It is about seeing clearly, naming clearly, and asking what remains when institutional promises fail. If the official future will not hold, then perhaps the task is not to keep begging entry into it. Perhaps the task is to build smaller and truer—to make room for relational, local, communal forms of life that can actually sustain us. For me, that has meant writing as a form of delayed echolalia, as self-support, as script-making in a time without reliable scripts. It has also meant recognising the people who meet me there. When there are no mirrors and no windows, sometimes the work is to become one for each other—to make enough shared light that something livable can finally be seen.
If the future they sold us will not hold, then let it fail. We were never meant to survive by forcing ourselves into a shape built by systems that do not know us and do not love us. We survive by recognising one another, by telling the truth about what is happening, and by building what can actually hold.


This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit autside.substack.com/subscribe

In this solo episode, I explore why “developmental delay” is often less a neutral description than a category error—one that misreads autistic gestalt processors through analytic tools that were never built to see them.
This week’s episode is a solo one. No Cathy, no squirrel, no familiar back-and-forth before the camera starts rolling. And in some ways, as much as I miss my friend and usual co-host, that feels right for what I’m trying to name here, because this is one of those recognitions that has been building quietly in the background of my work for a long time—something I have been noticing as a special educator, IEP case manager, and autistic gestalt processor, until the pattern became too clear to ignore.
What I’ve been seeing in longitudinal student data is not just a series of individual cases, but a recurring pathway. Many children are first identified under developmental delay, then later reclassified as autistic, and then—especially in girls—reclassified again as having a specific learning disability once they become more socially legible to the adults around them. They make a friend. They begin chatting. They look less obviously autistic to people trained to see only one kind of autism. By the time I meet many of them in high school, the paperwork is settled. But what I often find beneath that record is not simple delay. I find gestalt processing.
That is the core of this episode: the idea that delay is not a neutral term. It sounds objective, but it is built on assumptions—assumptions about sequence, about timing, about what counts as evidence, and about what language is supposed to look like when it develops “properly.” If the assessment framework assumes language must move from part to whole, then a child whose language develops from whole to part will almost always be misread. What looks like absence may actually be architecture. What gets called deficit may be coherence the system was never trained to see.
In this video, I talk through the thinking behind a new paper I’ve just written, When Delay Is a Category Error. The question underneath it is both clinical and ethical: what if many of the things we call developmental delay are not delays at all, but category errors—misreadings produced by instruments that are measuring the wrong thing, in the wrong way, under the wrong conditions? What if the diagnosis is telling us more about the framework than it is about the child?
I also spend time with what happens when schools and clinicians mistake performance under pressure for actual capacity. Gestalt processors can be full of meaning long before they are test-friendly. Language may be present in scripts, in affective anchors, in stored phrases, in atmospheres, in delayed retrieval, in forms that do not reveal themselves on command. When a child cannot show what they know in a stripped-down, decontextualised testing moment, that does not automatically mean the knowledge is not there. Sometimes it means the environment has made it inaccessible.
And that matters because the harm is not just descriptive. Once a child is named as delayed, the system often proceeds as though the interpretive work is finished. Their scripts are treated as noise. Their actual meaning gets interrupted. Their way of organising language is rendered illegible unless it can imitate the preferred form. Over time, that does not just distort assessment. It teaches the child that their own coherence does not count.
So this episode is part field note, part argument, and part threshold into the paper itself. It is about the limits of our instruments, the politics of what gets counted as development, and the cost of forcing autistic and gestalt-organised children into frameworks that were never built to recognise them. Sometimes delay is real. But sometimes what is being named is not the child’s absence. Sometimes it is the system’s failure to perceive the mind in front of it.


This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit autside.substack.com/subscribe

A video introduction to When the Future Won’t Hold—why this series is arriving now, why it must be poem-first and auto-theoretical, and what it means to name the collapse of futurity without flattening it into crisis.
This video is a threshold piece—an opening hand before the series begins in earnest. I wanted to speak directly, in my own voice, because When the Future Won’t Hold enters difficult terrain, and I did not want that terrain flattened by automation, sanitised by summary tools, or mistaken for melodrama. This series moves through states that psychiatry often names poorly—burnout, collapse, passive suicidality, the collapse of futurity—but it does so from inside lived experience, not from the outside language of compliance, surveillance, or forced optimism. It is not a performance of crisis. It is an act of witness.
At the heart of the video is a simple but devastating question: what happens when the future stops functioning as a believable structure? I speak about this both personally and professionally—as an autistic educator holding space for students whose lives have been reorganised in real time by political and economic decisions beyond their control. The promises they were handed at the start of secondary school—college, loans, deferment, a workable path forward—have been quietly revoked. And when the terms of survival change this abruptly, the damage is not only financial. It is existential. It alters meaning itself. This series names that rupture as a collapse of futurity: the moment when planning no longer feels like hope, but like contact with a door that has been bricked up whilst you were still walking toward it.
The video also explains the form of the series. These pieces are arriving poem-first because that is how they came to me—whole, lyrical, fielded before they were analysable. As a gestalt processor, I often receive meaning before I can dissect it. So the poem comes to me first, then the field notes, then the analysis, then the introduction. That is not an aesthetic gimmick. It is the architecture of the mind doing the work honestly. There is very little formal research for what I am trying to name here, so this series sits in the space of autotheory: lived experience in dialogue with frameworks like PTMF, Glasser’s Choice Theory, kairos and chronos, and the political conditions shaping our nervous systems in real time.
And perhaps most importantly, the video makes clear what the series is for. Not to romanticise despair. Not to produce inspiration porn. Not to turn difficult inner states into evidence against the people living them. Its purpose is to create language where there has been silence—to offer scripts for states that many autistic and gestalt-processing people know intimately, but rarely see named without punishment or pathologisation. It is an offering of company. A way of saying: if the thread between now and later has gone slack for you, too, you are not the only one. And until we build the fuller commons we need, this is one small place to begin.


This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit autside.substack.com/subscribe

Today’s episode advocates for a broader understanding of gestalt language processing that extends beyond early childhood intervention. Whilst identifying these unique linguistic patterns in youth has helped families move away from deficit-based models, Dr. Jaime Hoerricks argues in the source article that the medical field often neglects the adult experience. Individuals who process information in this holistic manner continue to navigate employment, relationships, and burnout long after they outgrow pediatric services. Therefore, the professional community must evolve to support the entire lifespan of gestalt processors rather than focusing solely on developmental delays. By acknowledging that these cognitive architectures persist into maturity, society can better respect the diverse ways adults continue to make meaning in the world.
Here’s the link to the source article: https://open.substack.com/pub/autside/p/reading-between-worlds-gestalt-grows
Let me know what you think.
The AutSide is a reader-supported publication. To support my work, consider becoming a paid subscriber.



This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit autside.substack.com/subscribe