Tom Nelson

Anika Sweetland argues the IPCC was created through politics, funding, and elite influence, tracing its origins to the 1985 Villach Conference and alleging it advances centralized global governance. She says media-driven fear shifted from 1970s “ice age” stories to 1988 “global warming,” citing sea-level warnings that did not occur. Sweetland claims climate finance and clean-energy investment incentives benefit IPCC-linked officials. She highlights Climategate emails as evidence of strategic data presentation (“hide the decline”), message management, and peer-review gatekeeping (“PAL review”), plus an alleged journal blacklist. She says her climate studies education omitted Climategate, emphasized policy “solutions,” and discouraged debate.

00:00 IPCC Exposed Intro
01:01 Ice Age Media Panic
02:06 Fear as Control Tool
03:36 Global Warming Rebrand
05:23 Sea Level Scare Claims
07:28 Villach Birth of IPCC
09:31 Global Governance Agenda
10:31 Trillions and Incentives
12:20 Climategate Data Tricks
18:57 Peer Review Gatekeeping
21:44 Blacklists and Ideology
23:31 Personal Wake Up Call
25:16 Who Controls Science
26:34 What We Can Do Next
27:23 Host Reacts and Questions
27:36 Climategate Not Taught
30:10 Policy Impacts UK Europe
33:15 Witch Hunts Parallel
37:22 Climate Degree Brainwashing
40:42 Only Graduate Story
43:15 Today’s Model Driven Teaching
45:19 Books and IPCC Origins
46:17 Closing Thanks and Wrap

https://x.com/anika_climate
=========
Slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summaries
My Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1

Liam DeBoer describes his Substack blending philosophy, psychology, culture, politics, and history, and argues in “Your Ruling Class Is Not Secular” that modern materialist elites still express religious impulses by mapping “soul,” apocalypse, and salvation narratives onto gender ideology, climate change, and revolutionary politics. He discusses Orwell’s 1984 as a psychological study of totalitarianism reshaping perception, and links current activism to young women, noting polling showing young women moving left and widening dating/marriage mismatches. He predicts widening Western factional conflict, references the “fourth turning,” and explains Nietzsche’s ressentiment and victimhood. He outlines “daycare governance” in a feminized institutional culture and summarizes “political ponerology” archetypes behind authoritarianism. He details Canada’s “Vancouver model” money laundering tied to triads, casinos, and politics, and discusses censorship, platform throttling, and Zuckerberg’s motives.

00:00 Meet Liam DeBoer
00:33 Ruling Class Religion
03:34 Climate as Cult
04:40 Orwell and Totalitarianism
07:53 Politics and Dating Divide
11:21 Fracture and Future Conflict
14:46 Fourth Turning Cycles
17:00 Nietzsche Ressentiment
23:32 Victimhood and Agency
26:24 South Korea 4B Fallout
28:01 Daycare Governance Model
35:06 Equality Clips Greatness
37:55 Political Ponerology Types
42:46 Canada Money Laundering
52:06 Censorship and Free Speech
55:30 Zuckerberg Rebrand
57:22 Closing and Links

https://liamoutloud.substack.com/
https://x.com/liam_out_loud
https://www.youtube.com/@liam-out-loud
=========
Slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summaries
My Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1

Ken Jensen describes his background in environmental toxicology and medical devices, then argues morality can be grounded without religion. He traces a “true, good, beautiful” triad from Plato through Vitruvius and maps it to objective reality, reciprocity/voluntary exchange, and beauty/grace, contrasting it with a destructive “DOI” (destruction, opposition, inversion) force. He critiques management tactics like permanent crisis, “red dot” diversions, and misuse of Romans 13, citing Katrina clergy response teams. He promotes a “dartboard” model over left-right politics, says ethics and morality are inseparable (Nuremberg vs Nazi view), warns about EU-style centralization, CBDCs, and praises ridicule as a defense. He discusses sound money and presents his books The Enemies of Reason and The Memo.

00:00 Meet Ken Jensen
01:02 Morality Without God
02:23 Early Doubts and Clues
05:13 Climate Debate and First Principles
06:15 Entropy Uppers and Downers
09:02 Religion as Binding Core
10:46 Words Shape Thought
13:38 Plato Truth Good Beauty
17:47 Rome Constantine and Control
20:26 Katrina Clergy Response Teams
23:12 Triad Mapped to Trinity
29:02 Dorothy Model and Inversion
30:43 Universities and Private Property
34:57 Aesthetics vs Brutalism
35:35 Destruction Opposition Inversion
36:04 Parasitic Tactics Explained
36:59 Inverting the Trinity
37:27 Defining What We Defend
38:12 Two Books Overview
38:57 Dartboard Not Left Right
41:04 Morality vs Legal Positivism
43:13 Takeaways Recalibration
46:37 Studying Evil and Pride
49:34 Red Dot Diversions
51:17 Wizard of Oz Q and A
51:48 CBDCs and EU Centralization
56:57 Permanent Crisis and Elites
58:33 Ressentiment and Ridicule
01:01:20 Sound Money Fixes Society
01:04:17 Wrap Up and Contacts

https://www.linkedin.com/in/kpjensen/
https://www.contactauthorkpj.com/
=========
Slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summaries
My Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1

In a Paris heatwave (33–40°C), Hügo Krüger says France suffers more indoors because only about 25% of homes have AC, unlike near-universal AC in the US/Japan. He describes ideological and regulatory resistance to AC from ecologists and left-wing politicians, despite AC being a reversible heat pump and France’s electricity being largely nuclear. Apartment rules, aesthetic objections, and energy ratings discourage installation; subsidies favor air-to-water heat pumps that can’t cool. Demand for fans and AC is surging, and politicians propose easing restrictions. He expects fewer deaths than 2003 due to heat alerts, but argues AC would reduce vulnerability.

00:00 Paris Heatwave Check In
01:00 Why France Lacks AC
01:33 Myths About Air Conditioning
03:00 Hospitals Trains And Culture
03:42 Politics And Nuclear Power Angle
07:20 Heat Deaths And Public Response
14:47 Regulations Blocking Reversible AC
16:44 How Rare Is This Heat
17:54 2003 Heatwave Lessons
20:31 Hardliners And Building Lobby
22:14 Insulation Fans And Daily Life
24:11 Bigger Pattern And Nuclear Future
29:04 Wrap Up And GoFundMe Plug

https://x.com/hkrugertjie
“fundraiser to buy an AC for the French Heat Wave!”: https://www.gofundme.com/f/help-me-not-melt-in-paris-2026-heatwave?lang=en_US&ts=1782483248
=========
Slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summaries
https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1

Erich Schaffer critiques the “super greenhouse effect” and argues that tropical outgoing longwave radiation stays flat mainly because tropospheric temperature is sluggish relative to surface temperature, not because water vapor amplifies greenhouse trapping. He says regional and seasonal proxies for water vapor feedback are invalid (citing admissions by Ramanathan/Inamdar and Dessler et al.) and claims interannual proxy results are distorted by aspect-ratio choices and improper OLS regression, advocating TLS or rotated-benchmark methods. Reanalyzing published plots (Spencer, Lindzen-Choi, Chung, Andy May), he concludes water vapor plus lapse rate implies strong negative feedback and low ECS (~1 K). He also alleges data “fudging” and broader scientific incompetence.

00:00 Super Greenhouse Effect
02:20 OLR Calculations Explained
03:28 Troposphere Sluggishness
05:32 Ramanathan Admission
10:23 Feedback Breakdown Math
12:37 Two Proxies Debunked
14:05 Revisiting Interannual Proxy
16:02 Bad Regression Plotting
17:16 Aspect Ratio Distortion
23:45 OLS vs TLS Regression
30:53 Negative Feedback Emerges
33:22 Spencer Regression Mystery
37:45 Lindzen Choi Critique
41:03 Fixing Lindzen Plot
51:17 Recent Andy May Example
53:21 Rotate Plot Method
55:19 Benchmark Slope Trick
57:38 Questionable Outliers
01:01:26 Proxies Fall Apart
01:02:22 Lapse Rate Physics
01:05:45 Tropical Hotspot Feedback
01:11:10 AR6 Codependency Critique
01:14:24 MODTRAN Water Vapor Test
01:19:44 Emission Altitudes Explained
01:25:22 Net Feedback and ECS
01:27:17 Blunders and Sociology
01:40:54 Q&A and Takeaway
01:44:44 Bonus Coal Math Error
01:47:42 Wrap Up

Erich Schaffer: “Water Vapor Feedback, Part One”: https://youtu.be/2O4mOf9gk-s
https://x.com/erich_schaffer
https://greenhousedefect.com/
=========
Slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summaries
My Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1