Tom Nelson

Tom interviews investigative journalist Sonia Elijah about her book 3/11 Viral Takeover, a five-year, evidence-based chronicle of the COVID era with 941 citations drawn from FOIA releases, emails, and leaked documents. Elijah argues COVID policy reflected a coordinated, censorship-driven response, tracing a timeline of pre-2020 pandemic exercises, media/government coordination, and conflicts of interest. She discusses the WHO’s March 11, 2020 pandemic declaration, alleged suppression of lab-origin discussion, flawed modeling used to justify lockdowns, and problems with PCR testing. The conversation covers propaganda and censorship networks (including the Trusted News Initiative), suppression of early treatments, harms from ventilators and drugs, and allegations of misclassified vaccine trial and safety data, including pregnancy and myocarditis concerns, urging accountability and preparedness against repetition.

00:00 Meet Sonia Elijah
00:18 Book Thesis and Censorship
01:17 Research Depth and Purpose
02:49 Will It Happen Again
04:40 Why 3 11 Matters
06:01 Pandemic Drills and mRNA Push
10:53 Bat Database Goes Dark
12:18 FOIA Emails and Lab Leak
15:04 Cracks and Conflicts
18:10 Lockdowns Driven by Models
19:19 PCR Testing Anomalies
25:31 Harms and Care Homes
26:37 Testing Kit Profiteering
29:40 Fear Messaging and Propaganda
32:10 Dancing Nurses and Empty Wards
33:39 Trusted News Initiative
37:17 Natural Immunity Censored
38:17 Lancet Study Fallout
40:13 Ivermectin Smear Campaign
41:57 Silencing Doctors Online
43:30 Hospital Protocol Controversies
45:09 Redefining Vaccinated Data
46:38 Retracted Myocarditis Research
48:46 Missing Safety Reports
53:31 Pfizer Papers Deep Dive
58:13 Vaccine Injured Silenced
59:52 Pregnancy Harms Revealed
01:04:40 Justice and Accountability
01:07:32 Closing Thoughts on the Book

https://x.com/sonia_elijah
https://linktr.ee/SoniaElijah
Book Review by Robert Malone— 3/11: Viral Takeover: https://www.malone.news/p/book-review-311-viral-takeover
Order it at Amazon here: https://www.malone.news/p/book-review-311-viral-takeover
=========
Slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summaries
My Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1

Thomas Kurz discusses his upcoming book, Why There Is No Climate Crisis (Kindle in May, print in June), and argues modest warming is largely natural, claiming the IPCC obscures evidence of past climate variability. He explains paleoclimate proxies (oxygen isotopes, carbon-14, beryllium-10) and links climate shifts to Milankovitch cycles, solar cycles, galactic cosmic rays influencing clouds, and ocean oscillations (AMO/PDO). Using temperature reconstructions, glacier, treeline, sea-level, historical freeze, agriculture, insect, and civilization records, he says warm periods brought prosperity while cold periods drove drought, famine, disease, and upheaval. He concludes about half of post-1850 warming is natural, warming is generally beneficial, and future cooling is likely.

00:00 Guest And Book Intro
00:24 Why He Dug In
01:46 Focus On Climate Cycles
03:44 Paleoclimate Proxies
04:57 Isotopes And Temperature
06:48 Cosmic Rays And Solar
07:56 Milky Way Climate Cycle
12:17 Milankovitch Ice Ages
14:28 CO2 Follows Temperature
17:10 Holocene Cooling Trend
19:29 Schwabe Solar Cycles
21:42 Millennial Solar Cycles
23:14 Temperature Reconstructions
25:04 Glaciers Treelines Seas
28:44 Historical Freeze Evidence
32:27 Farming And Wildlife Clues
37:06 Warm Vs Cold Impacts
41:28 Storm Evidence In Proxies
44:44 Civilizations And Climate
45:48 Holocene Optimum Prosperity
47:42 2200 BC Collapse Event
48:18 Minoan Warm Period Boom
50:47 Greek Dark Ages Breakdown
52:53 Roman Warm Period Growth
54:23 Late Antique Cooling Plagues
56:50 Medieval Warm Period Golden Age
59:11 Little Ice Age Hardship
01:06:46 Witch Hunts Climate Blame
01:09:16 Modern Warming Attribution Debate
01:12:17 Ocean Oscillations AMO PDO
01:15:44 No Climate Crisis Wrap Up

=========
Slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summaries
My Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1

Brenda Shaffer discusses her Wall Street Journal piece arguing that current renewable-driven policies undermine energy security by making Western systems less reliable, more expensive, and dependent on concentrated supply chains, often tied to China. She says maritime security failures (Red Sea, Russia-Ukraine, Strait disruptions) show poor preparation, and argues fossil fuels still dominate the global energy mix (87%) despite decades of subsidies, while wind/solar remain limited and require backup baseload. She criticizes restricting fossil-fuel finance, especially in Africa, for worsening energy access and development. Shaffer claims UN climate institutions are political, seek taxation power withouBt representation, and that climate movements often oppose both fossil fuels and nuclear. She highlights Germany’s costly energy transition, emphasizes operational energy in warfare, and calls to restore energy security as national security and enable open debate.

00:00 Renewables and Crisis
00:57 Energy Security Failures
03:04 Emperor New Clothes
05:36 China and Methane Politics
10:32 Climate Narratives vs Reality
12:33 Myths of Transition
16:26 Cutting Supply Hurts Poor
19:50 Africa Needs Real Power
26:36 Germany Energiewende Fallout
29:21 Climate Activism and Anti West
30:33 Hydrocarbon Roadmap Skepticism
31:19 UN Climate Taxes and Power Grabs
33:18 Transparency and Budget Secrecy
34:39 Trump Era Workarounds and Lawfare
38:08 Gatekeepers and Speaking Freely
39:13 Languages and Middle East Shifts
44:07 Operational Energy in Warfare
47:53 Military Electrification Limits
51:52 IPCC Politics and Carbon Markets
55:27 Extreme Weather Narratives
58:01 Energy Realism Closing Message

https://x.com/ProfBShaffer
=========
Slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summaries
My Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1

Former European Commission energy official Samuel Furfari recounts COPs from the 1992 UN climate convention through recent meetings, arguing the process became propaganda-heavy, expensive, and ineffective as global CO2 emissions rose 66% since 1992. He cites Glasgow as a turning point when China and India blocked anti-coal language, and notes recent COPs hosted by fossil-fuel producers and growing pushback from Africa and others seeking development. He criticizes “technology transfer,” NGO influence (especially in the EU), and anti-nuclear sentiment, discusses synthetic fuels as too costly until oil/gas decline, and describes shifts at the IEA and oil firms like BP back toward oil and gas.

00:00 Meet Samuel Furfari
01:02 COP Zero Origins
02:38 Berlin COP and Merkel
04:14 Glasgow Turning Point
06:11 Fossil Fuel Host COPs
09:39 Brazil COP Contradictions
10:46 Money and Degrowth Agenda
12:49 Nuclear and Synthetic Fuels
15:03 Cuckoo Takes the Nest
17:19 COP Spectacle and Emissions
20:07 Africa and Tech Transfer
22:44 Papua New Guinea Shifts
24:09 Polar Bear Messaging Fades
25:40 IEA From Oil to Renewables
29:03 US Pressures IEA
30:05 Oil Chokepoints Reality
31:08 Inside IEA Ideology
32:00 BP Retreats to Oil
35:21 Subsidy Driven Renewables
35:57 NGOs Power Shift
38:04 UN Leadership After Guterres
40:32 Africa Needs Electrification
43:06 Leaders Doubt Climate Agenda
46:57 China Emissions Outsourcing
49:31 COP Hosting Politics
53:39 COP15 Failure and Wrap

The Truth About the COPs: 30 years of illusions: https://a.co/d/05AuqsJE
https://x.com/FurfariSamuele
=========
Slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summaries
My Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1

Andy May discusses how Earth’s energy imbalance and ocean heat content relate to solar radiation versus greenhouse-gas downwelling IR. He argues IR photons are lower energy and absorbed in the ocean’s top micrometers–millimeter (thermal/electromagnetic skin), so it cannot directly heat the mixed layer; instead it may reduce upward heat loss by altering the skin-layer temperature gradient, while sunlight penetrates meters to greater than 100 m and warms the bulk ocean. He critiques NASA-style energy-flow diagrams for confusing one-way radiative fluxes (e.g., 340 W/m²) with net heat (e.g., 58 W/m²). He highlights large uncertainties in EEI and OHC due to sparse, inconsistent datasets, cool-skin effects, short Argo-era records, and oscillations like AMO/ENSO, making partitioning of causes uncertain.

00:00 Sun vs CO2 Setup
00:35 Why IR Differs
02:52 Ocean Skin Layers
05:48 Photon Energy Debate
07:55 Cool Skin Impacts
10:01 Energy Diagram Myths
13:33 EEI and OHC Limits
18:17 Ocean Data Disagreements
23:55 Surface EEI Variability
26:38 IR Cannot Heat Deep
29:51 Bottom Line Uncertainty
31:18 Q&A and Critiques
34:52 Modeling and Coverage
36:41 Regional Trend Map
41:21 Closing Takeaways

https://x.com/Andy_May_Writer
https://andymaypetrophysicist.com/
=========
Slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summaries
My Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1