PodcastsNewsVerdict with Ted Cruz

Verdict with Ted Cruz

Premiere Networks
Verdict with Ted Cruz
Latest episode

1079 episodes

  • Verdict with Ted Cruz

    Qatar’s Billion‑Dollar Influence Machine, Clarence Thomas Challenges Progressivism & the Liberal Heckler’s Veto Playbook Week In Review

    25/04/2026 | 32 mins.
    1. Allegations of Qatar’s Influence Campaign in the U.S.
    Qatar spends billions of dollars funding U.S. universities to influence American public opinion and academic culture.
    Qatar hires Washington, D.C.–based PR and lobbying firms to “whitewash” its image, particularly regarding claims of support for extremist groups.
    Qatar’s status is the largest foreign funder of U.S. universities, surpassing countries like China, and suggests this funding correlates with campus political activism.
    Specific universities (e.g., Harvard, MIT, Stanford, Carnegie Mellon) are highlighted as major recipients of foreign funds.
    Financial relationships will limit criticism of foreign governments, citing an example of a U.S. university campus in Qatar allegedly restricting speech about the Qatari regime.
    2. Clarence Thomas’s Judicial Philosophy
    Thomas is emphasizing: Judicial restraint and discipline
    Originalism and adherence to the Constitution’s original meaning
    The belief that rights come from God, not government, grounded in the Declaration of Independence

    His personal background (raised by his grandfather, strict discipline, plainspoken style) is presented as shaping his judicial approach.
    Thomas’s views with progressivism, which characterizes asserting that rights derive from government authority rather than natural or divine sources.
    A Senate hearing anecdote is used to illustrate this ideological divide, portraying progressive views as mainstream within the modern Democratic Party.
    3. Free Speech Conflicts on College Campuses
    At UCLA Law School, protesters disrupted a talk by a Department of Homeland Security lawyer.
    The disruption is a “heckler’s veto,” preventing speech rather than expressing dissent.
    Similar past incidents at Stanford Law School are cited to argue that some law students’ conduct is incompatible with professional legal standards.
    University administrations are failing to protect speech and enforce order during such events.
    Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
    YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/
    Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz
    X: https://x.com/tedcruz
    X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
    YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz
    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
  • Verdict with Ted Cruz

    Southern Poverty Law Center FUNDS the Klan, plus UCLA Law Students Silence Conservatives

    24/04/2026 | 36 mins.
    1. Allegations Against the Southern Poverty Law Center
    The Southern Poverty Law Center: Was criminally indicted by the U.S. Department of Justice.
    Funded or financially supported extremist groups, including the Ku Klux Klan, neo-Nazi organizations, and organizers of the 2017 “Unite the Right” rally.
    Engaged in wire fraud, money laundering, and donor deception.

    The SPLC is operating a fraudulent fundraising model, allegedly exaggerating or manufacturing extremism to increase donations.
    The SPLC funding of extremists is: Intentional
    Long‑term
    Central to its fundraising success

    Corporate donors (Apple, JPMorgan, MGM, etc.) are cited as unwitting enablers, accused of donating for “virtue signaling.”
    2. Media and Institutional Complicity
    Mainstream media ignored or covered up SPLC wrongdoing.
    Corporate America gave millions without oversight.
    Political and cultural elites protected SPLC due to ideological alignment.

    Past warnings from commentators (e.g., John Stossel) are cited as evidence that concerns were longstanding.
    3. Political Impact
    The Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville is described as: Financially linked to SPLC funding, according to the show’s claims.
    Used politically to attack conservatives and Donald Trump.

    The SPLC allegedly used extremist events to drive massive fundraising growth, citing revenue increases after major controversies.
    4. Free Speech and Campus Controversies
    A UCLA Law School event where progressive students allegedly disrupted and silenced a conservative speaker from the Department of Homeland Security.

    The behavior is a “heckler’s veto”, framed as: Antithetical to free speech
    A sign of ideological intolerance on the left

    Comparisons are made to similar incidents at Stanford Law School.
    Law students are criticized as being unfit for the legal profession if they engage in such conduct.
    Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
    YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/
    Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz
    X: https://x.com/tedcruz
    X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
    YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz
    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
  • Verdict with Ted Cruz

    Bonus: Daily Review with Clay and Buck - Apr 23 2026

    23/04/2026 | 1h 1 mins.
    Meet my friends, Clay Travis and Buck Sexton! If you love Verdict, the Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show might also be in your audio wheelhouse. Politics, news analysis, and some pop culture and comedy thrown in too.

    Here’s a sample episode recapping four takeaways. Give the guys a listen and then follow and subscribe wherever you get your podcasts.

    Iran's Game Plan

    Breaking news out of Virginia, where a state circuit court judge blocked certification of the voter‑approved redistricting referendum that would have shifted the state’s congressional map from a 6–5 split to a 10–1 Democratic advantage. The judge ruled the process unconstitutional, citing violations of Virginia’s constitutional requirements, improper use of a special legislative session, insufficient public notice, and what the court called a misleading ballot question. Clay and Buck explain why this ruling could derail the entire redistricting effort and force rapid intervention by the Virginia Supreme Court and possibly the U.S. Supreme Court. They emphasize that the legal uncertainty threatens election timelines, ballot preparation, and primary contests, turning Virginia into a potential national test case for how far courts will allow mid‑cycle redistricting to go.

    Clay Travis and Buck Sexton then pivot to Iran and global security, with extensive analysis of President Donald Trump’s statements on the situation in the Strait of Hormuz. The hosts examine Trump’s claim that the U.S. controls maritime traffic and is enforcing an effective blockade until Iran produces a deal, while also noting severe internal divisions inside Iran between hardliners, the IRGC, and civilian negotiators. Clay explains why Iran’s leadership crisis complicates diplomacy, while Buck lays out in detail how the blockade is inflicting devastating economic harm—particularly through Iran’s limited oil storage capacity and the long‑term damage caused by halting production.

    Resistance Judiciary

    Clay and Buck discuss the idea that the judiciary has become a de facto political actor, particularly during the Trump era. Buck describes what the hosts call a “resistance judiciary,” with judges using injunctions and procedural rulings to halt policy even when cases are likely to be overturned later. They contrast this trend with the Supreme Court’s role, warning that without a conservative majority, constitutional interpretation itself would become unrecognizable. The Virginia redistricting case is used as the most recent example of how a single judge can temporarily upend elections, legislative plans, and national strategy.

    They then pivot into an extended and highly critical discussion of Spirit Airlines and the blocked JetBlue merger, which Clay describes as one of the clearest examples of judicial failure in recent years. Clay explains how Spirit agreed to a multibillion‑dollar acquisition by JetBlue, warned that bankruptcy was inevitable without the merger, and then saw the deal halted after the Biden administration sued on antitrust grounds. A federal judge sided with the government, rejecting Spirit’s warning—only for the airline to file for bankruptcy months later and now face another potential collapse. Clay argues that the ruling wiped out shareholders, endangered thousands of jobs, and may now force taxpayers to subsidize an airline that could have survived through private market solutions.

    The Opposite of Reality

    Rafael Mangual, head of research for the Manhattan Institute’s Policing and Public Safety Initiative, for an extended interview that anchors much of the hour. The discussion opens with encouraging national crime trends, as Mangual explains that serious violent crime—especially homicides and shootings—is declining across many U.S. cities, with especially sharp drops in places like Memphis and Washington, D.C., which have been targeted by Trump administration federal task forces. Those efforts, combining multi‑agency law‑enforcement deployments and National Guard support, have produced dramatic results, including a reported more‑than‑40 percent reduction in violent crime in Memphis.

    Mangual and the hosts emphasize that crime reduction is not mysterious or unattainable but the product of consistent enforcement and public support for policing. Mangual contrasts the positive reception officers receive in high‑crime cities desperate for safety with hostility he says law enforcement faced in Minneapolis, illustrating how political culture and public messaging affect outcomes on the ground. The conversation then transitions into a frank, statistics‑based examination of homicide in America. Mangual outlines the typical profile of both homicide offenders and victims—young men, overwhelmingly Black or Hispanic, with extensive criminal histories and repeated prior arrests—arguing that the justice system already knows who the most dangerous individuals are but repeatedly releases them. He makes the case that serious habitual‑offender policies could cut the murder rate by another 50 percent, potentially saving roughly 10,000 lives per year, most of them in minority communities.

    The hosts build on those findings by discussing the historical precedent: from 1990 to 2014, the U.S. already reduced homicides by half, a change that added a full year of life expectancy to the average Black male. Mangual argues that public fatigue with permissive criminal‑justice policies after the post‑2020 crime spike is driving a political shift, with progressive prosecutors losing elections and states rolling back earlier reforms. Hour 3 of the Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show also digs into transit crime, highlighting how enforcement measures like fare gates and barriers on San Francisco’s BART system produced both a major revenue increase and a 41 percent drop in crime—evidence, the hosts say, that “broken windows”–style policies still work. This data‑backed approach is contrasted with proposals in New York to make buses free, which Clay and Buck argue would worsen safety and quality of life.

    Class Warfare Backfires

    Clay and Buck pivot to New York City politics and economics, focusing on Zohran Mamdani’s “tax the rich” agenda and a class‑warfare video targeting hedge‑fund billionaire Ken Griffin over his Manhattan penthouse. Clay and Buck criticize Mamdani for publicly singling out wealthy residents and businesses, arguing such rhetoric will accelerate capital flight, job losses, and long‑term fiscal damage. They highlight Griffin’s tax contributions, philanthropic giving, and job creation, warning that vilifying high‑income taxpayers risks hollowing out the city’s economic base and making New York less safe and less prosperous.

    Make sure you never miss a second of the show by subscribing to the Clay Travis & Buck Sexton show podcast wherever you get your podcasts! ihr.fm/3InlkL8

    For the latest updates from Clay and Buck: https://www.clayandbuck.com/

    Connect with Clay Travis and Buck Sexton on Social Media:
    X - https://x.com/clayandbuck
    FB - https://www.facebook.com/ClayandBuck/
    IG - https://www.instagram.com/clayandbuck/
    YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck
    Rumble - https://rumble.com/c/ClayandBuck
    TikTok - https://www.tiktok.com/@clayandbuck



    YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz
    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
  • Verdict with Ted Cruz

    BONUS POD: California’s Taxpayer‑Funded Illegal Migration Machine

    23/04/2026 | 13 mins.
    Large-Scale Spending Allegation
    Claims California spent approximately $1 billion to bring or support 400,000 undocumented immigrants.
    Attributes these figures to a report allegedly from the Manhattan Institute.

    Use of Public Funds
    Asserts state and federal tax dollars were directed to nonprofit organizations (e.g., Catholic Charities, Jewish Family Services, immigrant legal groups).
    Frames this funding as political kickbacks rather than humanitarian or service-based grants.

    Political Organizing Accusations
    Claims immigrant-advocacy organizations function as political machines: Organizing protests
    Producing political messaging
    Monitoring ICE activities

    Alleges coordination with Democratic political goals.

    Social and Economic Impact Narrative
    Argues mass immigration: Depresses wages
    Increases housing costs
    Strains public services
    Drives longtime residents out of California

    Uses anecdotal housing examples to emphasize overcrowding and rent inflation.

    Historical and Ideological Framing
    Compares modern Democratic immigration policies to 19th-century political machines (e.g., Tammany Hall).
    Frames migrants as: Economic tools
    Long-term welfare recipients
    Future Democratic voters

    Uses language suggesting exploitation and dependency.

    Criticism of Sanctuary Policies
    Strongly opposes sanctuary city laws.
    Frames limits on immigration enforcement as: Encouraging illegality
    Undermining public safety
    Blocking federal authority


    Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
    X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
    YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz
    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
  • Verdict with Ted Cruz

    Ted's Brand-New Book—A Biography of Clarence Thomas, Telling his Incredible Life Story and his Historic Impact on our Nation

    22/04/2026 | 37 mins.
    1. Purpose of the Book
    The book aims to: Tell Clarence Thomas’s personal life story, especially his rise from extreme poverty.
    Explain his judicial philosophy and jurisprudence in plain, accessible language.

    It is based on approximately 9.5 hours of exclusive, one‑on‑one interviews between Ted Cruz and Justice Thomas.
    Cruz emphasizes that the book is written for non‑lawyers, including students and general readers.
    2. Clarence Thomas’s Background and Life Journey
    Grew up in severe poverty in Pin Point, Georgia, raised primarily by his grandfather.
    Initially spoke a Gullah/Geechee dialect, not English.
    Experienced racism, hardship, family conflict, and personal struggles, including anger and a period of heavy drinking.
    Attended seminary with the intention of becoming a Catholic priest, later leaving due to disillusionment.
    Educated at Holy Cross College and Yale Law School.
    Underwent a major ideological transformation, moving from left‑wing Black Power activism to conservative principles over many years.
    3. Professional Rise and Historic Achievements
    Faced career obstacles due to perceptions surrounding affirmative action.
    Worked under Republican Senator John Danforth, which became a turning point.
    Served in: The Reagan administration
    The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
    The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals

    Appointed in 1991 as the second Black Justice on the U.S. Supreme Court.
    On track to become the longest‑serving Supreme Court justice in U.S. history (by 2028).
    4. Judicial Philosophy (“Going Further”)
    Thomas’s jurisprudence emphasizes: Originalism and the original meaning of the Constitution
    The belief that rights come from God/nature, not government
    A color‑blind Constitution
    Judicial restraint: judges should interpret and apply law, not create policy

    His opinions are intentionally plain‑spoken and accessible, reflecting his background and respect for ordinary citizens.
    The title Going Further reflects his tendency to push legal reasoning to its foundational principles rather than incremental change.
    5. Confirmation Hearings and Public Attacks
    The book examines the 1991 confirmation hearings, including: Allegations by Anita Hill
    Intense political and media attacks

    Cruz draws parallels between Thomas’s hearings and later Supreme Court confirmations (e.g., Brett Kavanaugh).
    Thomas is portrayed as enduring racialized hostility and vilification because of his conservative views.
    6. Legacy and Moral Example
    Clarence Thomas is presented as: A model of personal resilience, discipline, and principle
    Someone who maintained convictions despite decades of criticism

    Cruz argues Thomas would be widely celebrated if he were liberal, but instead has been marginalized.
    The book frames Thomas as a role model for principled living, not just for lawyers but for all Americans.
    Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
    YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/
    Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz
    X: https://x.com/tedcruz
    X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
    YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz
    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

More News podcasts

About Verdict with Ted Cruz

Join Senator Ted Cruz and co-host Ben Ferguson as they break down the most important news stories of the day and reveal what they mean for you. On "Verdict with Ted Cruz,” you will go behind the scenes of the political debates that define our country. "Verdict with Ted Cruz" is being brought to you by Jobs, Freedom, and Security PAC, a political action committee dedicated to supporting conservative causes, organizations, and candidates across the country. In 2022, Jobs, Freedom, and Security PAC plans to donate to conservative candidates running for Congress and help the Republican Party across the nation.
Podcast website

Listen to Verdict with Ted Cruz, The Daily and many other podcasts from around the world with the radio.net app

Get the free radio.net app

  • Stations and podcasts to bookmark
  • Stream via Wi-Fi or Bluetooth
  • Supports Carplay & Android Auto
  • Many other app features

Verdict with Ted Cruz: Podcasts in Family

Social
v8.8.12| © 2007-2026 radio.de GmbH
Generated: 4/25/2026 - 2:09:26 PM