Investigate Earth Conspiracy Podcast

The Epstein files were finally released, or at least that’s what we’re being told. But the more people dig into what was actually made public, the more obvious it becomes that this wasn’t transparency, it was a controlled leak. Names are still redacted. Documents are missing. Timelines don’t line up. And once again, the most powerful figures connected to Jeffrey Epstein seem to remain just out of reach. The question isn’t whether files were released, it’s why so much is still being withheld. Tonight, we’re going to talk about what didn’t come out, and why that matters. Was this about protecting ongoing investigations, or protecting reputations? Was this damage control, political insulation, or something even bigger? When the crime touches intelligence agencies, global elites, and untouchable institutions, the truth rarely comes out clean. So we’re going to speculate, connect dots, and ask the uncomfortable questions the media still won’t. Because if this was the full truth, they wouldn’t still be hiding so much.Visit our merchandise store here

Last night at AmericaFest, the Turning Point USA event that’s supposed to represent the future of the conservative movement, we didn’t just get speeches, we got a very public fracture. Ben Shapiro took the stage and delivered what was essentially a warning shot, aimed not at the left, but at parts of the right. His message was clear, that conservatism loses credibility when it tolerates extremists, conspiracy culture, and figures he believes poison the movement from within. Whether you agree with him or not, it was a declaration that the old coalition lines are shifting, and some people are being deliberately pushed outside the tent. Then came Tucker Carlson, and while he didn’t respond point by point, the contrast couldn’t have been sharper. Tucker framed his speech around free speech, power, and who gets to decide what ideas are acceptable. Instead of policing the movement, he questioned why dissent and uncomfortable conversations are suddenly treated as threats. Taken together, these two speeches weren’t just disagreements, they were competing visions for the soul of conservatism, one focused on gatekeeping and respectability, the other on open confrontation with power, and last night made it clear that this divide isn’t going away anytime soon.Visit our merchandise store 

Tonight we break down the private, behind-closed-doors meeting between Candace Owens and Erika Kirk, a sit-down that comes after months of public accusations, internal disputes, and growing distrust surrounding the attempted assassination of Charlie Kirk. Candace has openly challenged the official narrative coming from within TPUSA, claiming that key employees were not truthful about what really happened, and that challenge has sent shockwaves through conservative media and grassroots circles alike. We unpack why this meeting matters, what led to it, and what it signals for the future of transparency, accountability, and truth inside influential political movements. With rumors, contradictions, and unanswered questions still circulating online, we focus on separating speculation from substance and ask the question many people are still afraid to ask, what happens when loyalty collides with accountability, and who actually benefits when the full story never comes out.Visit our merchanidse store

In this episode, we break down the terror attack at Bondi Beach, which occurred during a public Hanukkah celebration, by separating what authorities have confirmed from the questions that still remain. We walk through the known timeline, the official explanation, and the immediate response from law enforcement and government officials, while also examining gaps, inconsistencies, and details that are being debated online and in independent media. As with any major breaking event, early narratives move fast, especially when an attack targets a religious gathering, and not all facts emerge at once. We take a careful look at security decisions, media framing, and the broader context surrounding the attack without jumping to conclusions or pushing an agenda. The goal is simple, understand what actually happened, what is verified, and what deserves further scrutiny as more information comes out.Visit our merchandise store

Tonight’s episode gets straight into the fire. We’re looking at Erika Kirk’s reaction to the wave of conspiracy theories swirling around the attempted assassination of Charlie Kirk, and why she decided to push back publicly on Fox News. We break down what she said, what she didn’t, and how her response fits into the larger media storm surrounding this moment. Then we turn to Marjorie Taylor Greene. Her split from the MAGA movement has become impossible to ignore, and her recent sit-down on 60 Minutes only added fuel to the conversation. We dig into the interview, the tension building behind the scenes, and what her shift might mean for the movement going forward.Check out our merchandise store with fresh new winter gear