Designed for Learning

• Teaching Students When (Not) to Use AI

  When satellite maps became available on our phones, some wondered what we would lose by becoming less oriented to the places we live or visit. But most of us have used these maps for many years now and find them to be incredibly useful. Which begs the question: Does it matter if we’ve lost our sense of direction a bit? Educators now find themselves asking similar questions about AI and teaching. What happens when we stop using a skill and allow technology to do it for us? Do we become de-skilled? When does that de-skilling matter? And in those cases where it does matter, how do we help students understand the importance of committing themselves to the hard work of learning?Educator, author, and higher ed consultant Derek Bruff joins host Jim Lang for a thoughtful conversation exploring how we might answer.Key Topics Discussed:The rubber duck effect as a way to think about AI’s potential role in brainstorming processesConcerns over people accepting the responses of AI as authoritativeThe sycophantic tendencies of chatbots and the importance of teaching students to read AI outputs with a degree of skepticismHow consulting AI compares to collective class discussion as a starting point for student papersDeveloping students’ metacognitive awareness and self-regulation so that they can determine when it’s helpful to use AI and when it’s notThe value to students of encountering course material in both digital and analog waysThe need to be intentional about AI use because the skills and experiences at play feel more core to who we are as humansA low-stakes experiment for instructors who don’t currently use AI muchGuest Bio: Derek Bruff directed the Vanderbilt University Center for Teaching for more than a decade and is currently an associate director at the Center for Teaching Excellence at the University of Virginia, where much of his work focuses on helping faculty respond to the challenges and opportunities posed by generative AI. Derek has written two books, most recently Intentional Tech: Principles to Guide the Use of Educational Technology in College Teaching. He writes a weekly newsletter called Intentional Teaching and hosts and produces the Intentional Teaching podcast.Resources Mentioned:Derek’s Podcast: Intentional TeachingDerek’s Newsletter: Intentional TeachingAlternative Use Test Article: “How does generative artificial intelligence impact student creativity?” (Journal of Creativity)Example Assignment: Do Something Impossible with AINotre Dame Learning’s Lab for AI in Teaching and LearningDesigned for Learning is hosted by Jim Lang, a professor of the practice in Notre Dame Learning’s Kaneb Center for Teaching Excellence and the author of several influential books on teaching. The podcast is produced by Notre Dame Learning’s Office of Digital Learning. For more, visit learning.nd.edu. You can also follow Notre Dame Learning on LinkedIn.

  --------  

  37:18

  --------

  37:18
• Making the Space to Reimagine Teaching

  When you become a teacher, you commit to a life of learning—not just for your students, but for yourself. You can feel totally comfortable and confident in your teaching practices, and then suddenly some new technology or some new group of students comes along and upends everything you think you know about education.In those moments, instructors often seek out resources and conversations with peers and students to think through how they might adapt their teaching. But actually giving up a beloved teaching technique can provoke a real sense of loss, and adopting a new approach can be scary.Jordan Troisi, director of the Center for Teaching and Learning at Colby College, talks with host Jim Lang about one way colleges and universities can support faculty on this journey: course design institutes. Both Colby and Notre Dame are home to such programs, in which faculty gather with colleagues and teaching specialists in an extended process of reimagining their work as educators.Key Topics Discussed:How course design work led Jordan to make a concrete change to his own teaching practicesCommon features of course design institutes, which run for a relatively short amount of time, and ways they can advance instructors’ lifelong efforts to improve as teachersMaking the time instructors spend in these institutes worth their commitmentIncorporating your experience in a course design institute as part of the narrative around your CVThe prevalence of grading as a topic Jordan sees instructors wanting to discussDrawing on relationships among faculty and a broader sense of belonging to motivate more instructors to participate in structured explorations of their teachingThe questions to ask when planning a course design instituteGuest Bio: Jordan Troisi serves as the director of the Center for Teaching and Learning at Colby College. He previously spent nine years as a psychology faculty member, first at Widener University and then at Sewanee: The University of the South. His scholarly work includes more than 20 peer-reviewed and invited publications on effective teaching as well as two books: Midcourse Correction for the College Classroom: Putting Small Group Instructional Diagnosis to Work and, most recently, Developing High-Impact Course Design Institutes: A Model for Change.Resources Mentioned:Book: Developing High-Impact Course Design Institutes: A Model for Change (Routledge)Colby Center for Teaching and Learning’s Course (re)Design InstitutesNotre Dame Learning’s Kaneb Center Course Design AcademyDesigned for Learning is hosted by Jim Lang, a professor of the practice in Notre Dame Learning’s Kaneb Center for Teaching Excellence and the author of several influential books on teaching. The podcast is produced by Notre Dame Learning’s Office of Digital Learning. For more, visit learning.nd.edu. You can also follow Notre Dame Learning on LinkedIn.

  --------  

  32:14

  --------

  32:14
• Recognizing Not All Brains Think Alike

  Over the last couple of decades, we’ve seen an explosion of books and articles about what’s often called “brain-based learning,” as neuroscientists and cognitive psychologists study and explain what circuits are firing when a student tries to memorize a fact or solve a problem.Without question, this scholarship has been a boon to teachers seeking to improve their practices. But there is a caveat: Not all brains think alike.Researchers call this neurodiversity, and it refers to the notion that every population will include people who have a range of ways of thinking, learning, and feeling.Author of the forthcoming book An Introduction to Neurodiversity for Educators, faculty development expert Sarah Silverman talks with us about challenges students who learn differently might face in the classroom and how instructors can foster environments where everyone has an opportunity to thrive.Key Topics Discussed:Sarah’s Ph.D. in entomology—and her journey from studying insects to working in the area of teaching and learning with a focus on neurodiversityThe origin of the term neurodiversity to describe the full range of cognitive differences among humans as well as the meaning and use of the related terms neurodivergent, neurotypical, and neurodiverseHow the neurodiversity movement emerged out of the desire of autistic people to be accepted rather than “cured” and the ways that influences Sarah’s work with facultyReal-world examples, including from her own experiences as someone who is neurodivergent, that illustrate the value of instructors connecting with students to get a fuller picture of who they areWays instructors might support neurodivergent learners who are encountering challengesAccess friction—i.e., when the access needs of one person or group come into conflict with those of another—and how being flexible can help instructors approach such situationsThe value of having students themselves help you find solutions (and why it’s okay if they’re not utopian)Guest Bio: Sarah Silverman is an independent scholar and faculty developer focusing on neurodiversity and accessibility in higher education. In her work on many different campuses, she helps faculty better understand how neurodiversity impacts teaching and learning and how to balance many different needs among instructors and learners. She earned a Ph.D. in entomology from the University of California, Davis, and an advanced certificate in disability studies from the CUNY School of Professional Studies. Her book An Introduction to Neurodiversity for Educators will be published next year by the University of Oklahoma Press as part of the Teaching, Engaging, and Thriving in Higher Ed Series, which is edited by Designed for Learning host Jim Lang and Michelle Miller.Resources Mentioned:Sarah’s Substack Newsletter: Beyond the ScopeNeurodiversity concepts discussed during the episode drawn from Autistic Community and the Neurodiversity Movement: Stories from the Frontline edited by Steven KappDesigned for Learning is hosted by Jim Lang, a professor of the practice in Notre Dame Learning’s Kaneb Center for Teaching Excellence and the author of several influential books on teaching. The podcast is produced by Notre Dame Learning’s Office of Digital Learning. For more, visit learning.nd.edu. You can also follow Notre Dame Learning on LinkedIn.

  --------  

  37:40

  --------

  37:40
• AI, Cheating, and Trusting Students to be Human

  If you follow the conversations about higher education on social media or in the news, a primary topic on people’s minds is the impact of artificial intelligence on the purposes and processes of an education.For better or worse, much of the focus has been on cheating: Are students outsourcing their work, and their learning, to tools like ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, and Google Gemini? Some high-profile stories have gone so far as to suggest cheating is so rampant that the whole college system is basically collapsing around us.Tricia Bertram Gallant, coauthor of the new book The Opposite of Cheating: Teaching for Integrity in the Age of AI, helps us put these claims into context, providing insights into the deeper questions that we should be asking about academic dishonesty and integrity and sharing pedagogical strategies for adapting to AI’s widespread availability.Key Topics Discussed:Why students cheat (spoiler: the reasons aren’t new)The role of “neutralizing,” or moral justifications, in allowing people to view cheating as bad in the abstract but not in their current situationNot putting the burden to intuit the purpose of an assignment on studentsHow AI has changed cheating, but not why students do itExperimenting with AI tools so you can create guardrails for students—and why doing so doesn’t mean you think less of them as peopleStrategies for communicating effectively with students about generative AIRethinking when, why, and how writing is assigned, including the benefits of having students complete some of that work in the classroomThe potential of pairing written exams with oral assessments—which it turns out students often appreciateHow Tricia suggests instructors react when suspecting a student has cheatedGuest Bio: Tricia Bertram Gallant is the director of the Academic Integrity Office and Triton Testing Center at the University of California San Diego. President emeritus of the International Center for Academic Integrity, she has more than 20 years of experience as an academic integrity researcher, author, teacher, and practitioner.Her fifth book, The Opposite of Cheating: Teaching for Integrity in the Age of AI, which she co-authored with David Rettinger, was published this March. It is part of the Teaching, Engaging, and Thriving in Higher Ed Series at the University of Oklahoma Press edited by Designed for Learning host Jim Lang and Michelle Miller.Resources Mentioned:Book: The Opposite of Cheating: Teaching for Integrity in the Age of AI (University of Oklahoma Press)Tricia’s Podcast and Contact Info: theoppositeofcheating.comNotre Dame Learning’s Lab for AI in Teaching and Learning (LAITL)Related Designed for Learning Episode: Navigating AI’s Evolving Role in Teaching and LearningNotre Dame’s Undergraduate Academic Code of HonorDesigned for Learning is hosted by Jim Lang, a professor of the practice in Notre Dame Learning’s Kaneb Center for Teaching Excellence and the author of several influential books on teaching. The podcast is produced by Notre Dame Learning’s Office of Digital Learning. For more, visit learning.nd.edu. You can also follow Notre Dame Learning on LinkedIn.

  --------  

  38:28

  --------

  38:28
• Writing Like You Teach

  Can you draw lessons from the way you teach and apply them in your writing? Designed for Learning host Jim Lang thinks so—so much so that he’s written a new book about it called Write Like You Teach: Taking Your Classroom Skills to a Bigger Audience.To learn more, we flipped the script and asked Kristi Rudenga, director of Notre Dame Learning’s Kaneb Center for Teaching Excellence, to interview Jim, a professor of the practice at the Kaneb Center, about his latest project.He shares his insights on the intersection of teaching and writing, offering strategies for educators looking to expand their reach through engaging, accessible prose intended for broader audiences. He also talks about how a life-threatening health situation shaped the creation of Write Like You Teach.Key Topics Discussed:Jim’s career trajectory as an academic, speaker, and writer of popular books and columns on teachingThe inspiration behind Write Like You Teach and how it bridges his passions for teaching and writingTranslating classroom teaching practices into impactful writing techniquesThree core areas to consider to write like you teach: questions, attention, and evidenceOvercoming impostor syndrome when writing for non-academic audiences by recognizing your role as an educator in both classroom and writing contextsJim’s personal journey of recovery from a heart transplant and stroke, and how it affected his writing processGuest Bios: Jim Lang is a professor of the practice in Notre Dame Learning’s Kaneb Center for Teaching Excellence. The author of several popular books on teaching, including Distracted: Why Students Can’t Focus and What You Can Do About It and Small Teaching: Everyday Lessons from the Science of Learning, Jim writes regularly on teaching and learning for The Chronicle of Higher Education and co-edits a book series on higher education for the University of Oklahoma Press. His latest book is Write Like You Teach: Taking Your Classroom Skills to a Bigger Audience.Kristi Rudenga is the director of Notre Dame Learning’s Kaneb Center for Teaching Excellence, where she is appointed as a teaching professor. In addition to overseeing the Kaneb Center’s team, strategy, partnerships, and initiatives, Kristi consults with instructors on pedagogical approaches and facilitates seminar series and workshops on teaching and mentoring. She writes about pedagogy for The Chronicle of Higher Education, and she has served on the Core Committee of the POD Network, the national organization supporting educational development.Resources Mentioned:Book: Write Like You Teach: Taking Your Classroom Skills to a Bigger Audience (University of Chicago Press)Website: jamesmlang.comJim’s LinkedInDesigned for Learning is hosted by Jim Lang, a professor of the practice in Notre Dame Learning’s Kaneb Center for Teaching Excellence and the author of several influential books on teaching. The podcast is produced by Notre Dame Learning’s Office of Digital Learning. For more, visit learning.nd.edu. You can also follow Notre Dame Learning on LinkedIn.

  --------  

  26:25

  --------

  26:25

More Education podcasts

Trending Education podcasts

About Designed for Learning

Designed for Learning: Podcasts in Family