Powered by RND
PodcastsEducationThe Catholic Thing

The Catholic Thing

The Catholic Thing
The Catholic Thing
Latest episode

Available Episodes

5 of 206
  • What World and Time Is This?
    One of the better ways of trying to understand a writer or speaker is to imagine what audience he thinks he's addressing, and what he believes that audience most needs to hear. For the popes of the last half century or so, I think I pretty much understood what St. John Paul II and Benedict XVI were driving at, and the people they hoped to reach. With Francis - and now Leo - I'm much less sure. Because the world that they seem to think that they're addressing is not the one that I believe I'm living in. Item: Leo's recent homily to "Synodal Teams and Participatory Bodies," during which he remarked: "The supreme rule in the Church is love. No one is called to dominate; all are called to serve. No one should impose his or her own ideas; we must all listen to one another. No one is excluded; we are all called to participate. No one possesses the whole truth; we must all humbly seek it and seek it together." It caused a stir because some people interpreted this to mean denying revealed truths of the Faith in favor of the amorphous "walking together" and "dialogue" that Pope Francis hoped would synodalize the whole Church. That interpretation doesn't seem entirely wrong, since Fr. James Martin, S.J. immediately highlighted those words for his usual causes. But it doesn't seem entirely right either, at least in Leo's case. In fact, when he was addressing the members of the diplomatic corps accredited to the Holy See in May, he affirmed quite clearly that: the Church can never be exempted from speaking the truth about humanity and the world, resorting whenever necessary to blunt language that may initially create misunderstanding. Yet truth can never be separated from charity, which always has at its root a concern for the life and well-being of every man and woman. Furthermore, from the Christian perspective, truth is not the affirmation of abstract and disembodied principles, but an encounter with the person of Christ himself, alive in the midst of the community of believers. Yet whenever the subject is "synodality," substantial affirmation of truth seems to become an embarrassing no-no, even a stumbling block. It's been claimed lately that Leo is still using Francis' team of speech writers. Perhaps so. And maybe once the whirlwind of the Jubilee is over, we'll get more considered words from him. But if he had asked me to write that controversial speech about none of us possessing the whole truth, I would have emphasized that, particularly in our day, the vast majority of people already believe that no one, no church, no institution has the truth. It's far more urgent that they hear something like, "go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you." (Matthew 28:19-20) All Christians are, of course, "on the way," since none of us has arrived at our final destination - yet we're accompanied by revealed truths that guide us on our way, even as we strive to live them more fully. Yet we have a second pope now who at times seems to assume that the people who actually pay some attention to what a pope has to say need to be warned not to be so sure they have a grip on Catholic truth. When I look around me in our flailing postmodern world anno Domini 2025, however, Catholics and non-Catholics alike are far more in need of assurances about the truth of God's Word and the historic teachings of the Church. In fact, this whole episode reminded me of arguments that I got caught up in some decades ago. At the time, two Protestant theologians - if memory serves - Stanley Hauerwas and George Lindbeck were talking about how Christian currents had changed in recent centuries. I'm simplifying and probably garbling their central points, given the passage of time. But the historical part went something like this. Christianity had moved from what was basically an authoritarian posture (churches simply declared doctrines with a...
    --------  
    6:05
  • Of IVF and the Full Gospel of Life
    By Bishop James D. Conley President Trump recently announced measures to expand access to and reduce costs associated with in vitro fertilization (IVF). This is being billed as a pro-family and pro-life effort to help "American families have more babies." While the intention and goal are noble, IVF, in fact, undermines human dignity, marriage, and family life for a variety of reasons. But first, a word to those conceived through IVF, those struggling with infertility and, by extension, those wrestling with this aspect of the Church's teaching, which can seem counterintuitive, confusing, and even harsh. For anyone conceived through IVF, know that you are a gift, not just to your parents but to us all. Regardless of how someone was conceived, every human person is made in the image and likeness of God and therefore is loved by God and shares in the same inviolable dignity as each one of us. For those who struggle with infertility, I walk with you in your sufferings. There is a deep yearning within the human heart to love and to be loved. Spouses desire to come together in marital intimacy and bring new human life into the world. When that desire is unfulfilled, it can cause disappointment, stress, shame, envy, anger, and desperation. Like so many other sufferings, infertility is part of the mystery of Original Sin and the wounded, fallen world in which we live. Yet God calls us to bear these crosses with grace and dignity. We need not carry our crosses alone, however. Jesus meets us in our sufferings. He walks with us, desires to make us whole, and hopes we see the good He can bring out of suffering. As the Sisters of Life so beautifully state: "Jesus is intimately familiar with the barren wilderness and yearns to meet us there until we can rest refreshed in the Promised Land with Him." The Church supports technologies and medical interventions, such as restorative reproductive medicine, that help married couples address the root causes of infertility and naturally achieve a pregnancy through sexual union. These interventions are often very successful. Given the number of people with reproductive-health issues, these efforts deserve a greater commitment of our scientific and medical resources. Infertility cannot always be resolved successfully, either by restorative measures or IVF. But restorative options provide great hope and opportunity to couples, while respecting the dignity of human life, marriage, family life, and Church teachings. To return to President Trump's recent executive action, there are several key reasons why this action is ethically compromised and morally misguided. As our U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops recognized in response, "The IVF industry treats human beings like products and freezes or kills millions of children who are selected for transfer to a womb or do not survive." It's important to understand that in nearly every IVF cycle, many more embryos are created in the lab than it's possible or desirable to implant in the womb of the intended mother. Those not implanted are either destroyed, frozen indefinitely, or abandoned, which often results in those tiny human beings becoming victims of medical experimentation. Often with IVF, multiple embryonic human beings are implanted in the womb and survive, but are then "eliminated" because they can threaten the mother's life and health. In other words, these babies' lives are terminated through "selective reduction" abortions. None of this is pro-life, nor is it pro-family. It's dismissive of human dignity and the real value of individual human lives, one of the clearest examples of the "throwaway culture" Pope Francis warned us against. At a fundamental theological level, IVF undermines the marital act as the natural means for achieving a pregnancy. Rather than begetting new life through an act of love between a husband and wife in accord with God's design for life-giving love, IVF relies on medical professionals and other technicians to manufactur...
    --------  
    6:40
  • Phil Lawler's Novel: 'Ghost Runners'
    By Fr. Jerry J. Pokorsky Many things remind those of us with eyes to see of the enduring dangers of ideological confusion. In an effort to sort out a few of such confusions, veteran Catholic journalist Phil Lawler exposes the spiritual disorientation of post-conciliar Catholic life in his latest novel, Ghost Runners, which is just appearing this month A Harvard graduate who also studied political philosophy at the University of Chicago, Lawler brought his analytic rigor first to Washington as Director of Studies at the Heritage Foundation, and later to Catholic journalism - as editor of The [Boston] Pilot, Catholic World Report, and founder of Catholic World News, the first online Catholic news service in English. He also ran in 2000 as a candidate for the U.S. Senate from Massachusetts and, alas, was badly beaten by Senator Ted Kennedy. But it was a valuable lesson: too many pro-life Catholics fail to translate their convictions to ordinary life, including in how they choose to vote. Catholic World News has since transitioned (to use that now-suspect term) to the CatholicCulture.org website. Books (and films) about priests can be saccharine, pietistic, brutally scandalous, cartoonish, and downright dishonest. Even the great Fulton Sheen wrote a book, Those Mysterious Priests. Typical of Bishop Sheen, it contained orthodox and solid doctrine, though perhaps it failed to identify a few warts among the brotherhood. But if Phil isn't Fulton Sheen, neither is he Andrew Greeley (remember him?) ecclesiastical muckraker extraordinaire. In Ghost Runners, we see hints of Flannery O'Connor's Wise Blood, Godfather III, and perhaps a touch of Alfred Hitchcock's Psycho along with a dash of Ghostbusters. Lawler's protagonist cannot escape the graces of his priesthood amid careerist and worldly Church officials. Even as he confronts evil - both clerical and secular - he discovers mystical realities within and beyond the confessional. And add in a PBS documentary on El Salvador for good measure. Lawler utilizes his extensive experience to demonstrate how priests navigate the Church's complex waters and sustain their faith. Although this is a work of fiction, the main character types are familiar to most priests - and in all likelihood especially so to the priests of the Archdiocese of Boston. Lawler sets his story in the Reagan years, a period that comes more sharply into focus as the narrative unfolds. The young priest protagonist tells his story to the chancery-appointed psychologist. He reveals his personality and the profiles of his brother priests. The narration describes the realistic and wonderfully complicated intricacies of the priesthood from the inside. Such stories are familiar to any priest alive today who suffered through the 1980s. Many religion writers - conservative and liberal alike - never quite capture that reality. Lawler does. The priest protagonist remains faithful despite many reasons to surrender to infidelity or walk away from the priesthood. He identifies several routine vices among the clergy that usually aren't categorized as scandalous but, like every sin, can lead to great evil. Catechists like me may pedantically write about the Catholic principle/prudential judgment distinction. Lawler illustrates the distinction with a compelling account of the priest's visit to 1980s El Salvador during its civil war. Perhaps unconsciously, Lawler captures the habitual and unhealthy caste system that begins in the seminary. He portrays this same ecclesial anxiety in his depiction of alleged mystical events. The treatment recalls an old joke from the pontificate of Pope John Paul II: What are the two things a bishop dreads most for his diocese? First, an alleged apparition of the Blessed Virgin Mary. Second, a papal visit to his diocesan territory. But in a real-life instance, Lawler's characters wrestle with a third high-maintenance possibility: the allegation that little old ladies are undergoing mystical and miraculous...
    --------  
    5:56
  • Softly and Gently, Dearly-Ransom'd Soul
    By Rev. Peter M.J. Stravinskas. But first a note from Robert Royal: Today, in Rome, the great English convert and theologian, St. John Henry Newman, will be proclaimed Doctor of the Church by Pope Leo XIV. Newman will enter that august and select company - he makes only the 38th Doctor (i.e., Teacher) out of all the billions of Catholics who have lived on earth. With good reason. His gifts were many and great. And today Fr. Stravinskas reminds us of his achievements - over and beyond the theology, the history, and the polemics - as a poet, and guide of souls. Now for today's column. St. John Henry Newman, at age fifteen, embarked on a decades-long journey: in the words of his motto, ex imaginibus et umbris in veritatem ("From images and shadows into the truth"). For many years on his theological sojourn, Newman stood by the teaching of the 39 Articles of Religion of the Anglican Communion, including the one that describes Purgatory as a "pernicious" doctrine. With much prayer, intense study of the whole thrust of Sacred Scripture, as well as the convincing witness of the Fathers of the Church, he ended up writing one of the finest works on Purgatory, "The Dream of Gerontius," which rivals the depth and beauty of Dante's appreciation of Purgatory in his Divina Commedia; perhaps this work is best known through the lovely hymn, "Praise to the Holiest," which Pope Benedict XVI quoted in his homily at Newman's beatification. In Newman's poem, a soul is in its last agony and is trying to make sense of his final moments, assisted by his Guardian Angel. The dying man cannot understand why he has become so calm in the face of this previously dreaded experience; the angel tells him that the prayers of the priest and his friends who surround him have given him confidence and, further, that the "calm and joy uprising in thy soul is first-fruit to thee of thy recompense, and Heaven begun." The man gradually slips more and more and becomes concerned about the loss of his senses; the Angel comforts him: "till that Beatific Vision, thou art blind; for e'en thy Purgatory, which comes like fire, is fire without its light." The soul is buoyed up by that knowledge and conforms his will to God's, asking but to see the Face of God for no more than a moment before embarking on his process of purification. The Angel declares that he shall, in fact, see God for just such a twinkling of an eye, but warns him: "That sight of the Most Fair will gladden thee, but it will pierce thee too." This soul will now "learn that the flame of Everlasting Love doth burn 'ere it transform." He is now ready to face the Lord in judgment, the sight of whom "will kindle in thy heart all tender, gracious, reverential thoughts." And what might such thoughts be? Best to allow the poetic genius of Newman to speak directly for, as he knew, cor ad cor loquitur (his cardinalitial motto: "Heart speaks to heart"): Thou wilt be sick with love, and yearns for Him And feel as though thou couldst but pity Him, That one so sweet should e'er have placed Himself At disadvantage such, as to be used So vilely by a being so vile as thee. There is a pleading in His pensive eyes Will pierce thee to the quick, and trouble thee. And thou wilt hate and loathe thyself; for, though Now sinless, thou wilt feel that thou hast sinn'd, As never thou didst feel; and wilt desire To slink away, and hide thee from His sight: And yet wilt have a longing aye to dwell Within the beauty of His countenance. And these two pains, so counter and so keen, The longing for Him, when thou seest Him not; The shame of self at thought of seeing Him, Will be thy veriest, sharpest Purgatory. As the man proceeds to the divine tribunal, he is astonished to hear earthly voices; once more, he is reminded that he hears the priest and his friends praying the Subvenite ("Come to their aid, ye saints of God") on his behalf, bringing now the same Angel of the Agony who strengthened Christ in His final hours to do the same for t...
    --------  
    8:42
  • All Hallows' Eve
    By David Warren. Readers of books, and specifically fantastic books by Charles Williams and other Inklings, are summoned. I do not like them as much as I should, for I have never been a fan of fantasy literature, and I note that among the Inklings, only J.R.R. Tolkien is a reliable Catholic. But C.S. Lewis is almost a Catholic, and the other two I have read are largely sympathetic. I wouldn't put any of them on the Index. Williams was the first I discovered. I haven't fully discovered Tolkien even yet, though devoted types have upbraided me. Only Lewis is what I would call the preachy type, to whom I am naturally allergic. In a sense, Owen Barfield is the antidote to Lewis, though as an anthroposophist and translator of Rudolf Steiner, my trust in him is not unqualified. Let me just say that, like Lewis, I very much like him. Yes, Tolkien. I should have been reading by now, but my aversion to hippies when I was young and impressionable kept me away. Tolkienists may be nice people, but I am not a nice person. That is perhaps why I was drawn to Charles Williams, who by reputation was not a nice person. C.L. Wrenn (another Inkling), for instance, suggested burning him at the stake for his views, or something equally warm. While none of the Inklings were vegetarian when making arguments, this drew some blood. It is ALL HALLOWS' EVE today, and I have been rereading the novel thus entitled by Williams. It was his last, and as he died just a few days after Hitler, recent accusations of anti-Semitism against him are not really plausible. The worst you could say is that his Antichrist character is Jewish, but English-speaking intellectuals were not plunged into Holocaust reporting until later in that year, 1945. The novel opens with the death of a young woman, told from inside. It was the sort of thing that was happening when the book was published. Airplanes were crashing, here, there, and everywhere, making death slightly more common than it is today. And Christians will know that death has supernatural implications. Williams didn't avoid them. His plot, which develops out of the young woman - Lester Furnival - gradually realizing that she is dead, and then wandering through post-mortal London or the City of God, with her also late companion, Evelyn. Interactions between dead and living are presented from both sides. All Hallows' Eve, the seventh and concluding novel in Williams' remarkable series, deserved its place as one of Messrs. Faber and Faber's more reprintable books, reissued in America with a preface by T.S. Eliot. It was Eliot who tagged Williams as the author of "spiritual thrillers," a special genre. For remarkable people like Dante Alighieri and Charles Williams were capable of writing such things. It is easy enough to write a thriller, but making a narrative "co-inhere" with a spiritual plot is difficult, on the scale of impossible. One must rise to classical heights; casual contact just won't do. But Williams, too, was a shameless "religious nutjob," whose wanderings into, for instance, Jewish mysticism, can be distressing to the modern secular reader, for it suggests the universe is uncomfortably large, and there may be more in it than a remorseless secularism could tolerate. Indeed, Williams was also quite aware that Jesus Christ was a Jew. Curiously, it was the reliable J.R.R. Tolkien who delivered the most subtle criticism of Williams' processions into the occult. But Williams goes there to a purpose, and comes back with important news from the supernatural realm. It is that both good and evil are present at large, and will both be encountered when one invades either nature or supernature unprepared. A good life is, of course, the best preparation, and the Godhead, in the person of Jesus Christ, is the best companion. Williams was, by nature, a theological writer, whether his genre is theology or not. He can be entertaining, but even this is meant to a theological end. When he is writing of Dante - and his boo...
    --------  
    6:32

More Education podcasts

About The Catholic Thing

The Catholic Thing is a daily column rooted in the richest cultural tradition in the world, i.e., the concrete historical reality of Catholicism.
Podcast website

Listen to The Catholic Thing, The Mel Robbins Podcast and many other podcasts from around the world with the radio.net app

Get the free radio.net app

  • Stations and podcasts to bookmark
  • Stream via Wi-Fi or Bluetooth
  • Supports Carplay & Android Auto
  • Many other app features
Social
v7.23.11 | © 2007-2025 radio.de GmbH
Generated: 11/5/2025 - 5:30:59 AM