The Grant

Supporting Startups and SMEs into EU Funding
With Lise Pape and Rasmus Mørk

Check out how you can collaborate with The Grant

Check out the episode website
In my earlier field recording with Lise Pape from Walk With Path, we touched on the support she had received from Greater Copenhagen EU Office. This time, I bring Lise together with Rasmus Mørk, who has been supporting her, to look more closely at what that support actually involves.
Rasmus explains how he works with startups and SMEs to understand their product-development plans, identify relevant EU funding programmes, assess whether an opportunity is worth pursuing and develop the first outline of a potential project. Lise shares how that has worked from the company side—from discovering calls she might otherwise have missed to discussing consortium composition and whether a particular opportunity really fits the company. #248 Supporting Start Ups and S…
And there is an important reality check throughout: EU funding is high-hanging fruit. Not every innovative company should apply. Sometimes the best support is helping a company realise early that its time and resources would be better spent elsewhere.

Time codes:
02:03 Guest introduction and fly in
06:55 Supporting Walk with Path
21:14 How CopenVirk Supports Companies
36:05 Reflections

Experienced Exploitation – From Results to Real-World Value
With Carmen Bianca Socaciu

Check out the episode website

Check out how you can work with The Grant

Exploitation is ultimately about what happens to the results of an EU-funded project beyond the project itself. In episode #246, I’m joined by Carmen Bianca Socaciu, who has worked with exploitation for more than a decade, to explore what that process actually looks like in practice.

We move from identifying results and developing value propositions to understanding customer needs, business models, market conditions and the people inside partner organisations who can actually make decisions. Carmen also explains why exploitation is as much about trust, curiosity and human relationships as it is about business tools.

And we look at the difficult cases too: sustainable technologies that cannot break even, market conditions that change during a four-year project, results that are ready for market but have nobody willing to pick them up, and the uncomfortable gap between publicly funded R&D timelines and commercial reality.

Time codes:
02:20 Guest introduction and fly in
06:35 Understanding Exploitation
12:01 From Project Results to Real-World Use
24:37 Sustainability, Regulation and Long-Term Impact
40:11 Becoming a Strong Exploitation Partner
47:56 Reflections and advice
50:42 The toughest challenge

The RM Framework Quality Label – Making Training Comparable
RM Framework Series #11 with Blanka Csite from EARMA

Check out the episode webiste with links

Research management training across Europe comes in many different forms—from accredited university programmes to short professional courses, micro-credentials and training delivered by professional associations. In episode #11 of the RM Framework Series, I’m joined by Blanka Csite from EARMA to explore how the project’s proposed Quality Label could help bring more transparency to that landscape.
Blanka explains why the current approach is voluntary, developmental and proportionate rather than pass-or-fail, and how self-assessment can help training providers reflect on their purpose, target group, learning outcomes and links to RM Comp competencies and proficiency levels. We also look at what the Quality Label could mean for research managers themselves: clearer information about what different programmes actually offer, making it easier to identify training that matches their own professional development needs. The concept is still being refined through pilot feedback and wider consultation with the European research management community.

Time codes:
02:13 Guest introduction and fly in
04:17 Introducing the Quality Label
09:59 Developing the Quality Label Approach
19:06 Supporting Training Across the ERA
25:13 From Development to Testing
29:05 Reflections

Inside Creative Europe – Helping Culture & Media Access EU Funding

With Nicoline Joy Haas and Lone Friboe Garde from Creative Europe Desk Denmark
Check out the episode website for more information

Want you own podcast? Reach out
For episode #245, I travelled to the Danish Film Institute in Copenhagen, where Nicoline Joy Haas and Lone Friboe Garde joined me for an in-person recording inside one of the Institute’s cinemas.

Together, they introduce the two main corners they work with: Nicoline covers the Culture strand, spanning areas such as music, literature, performing arts, architecture, museums and cultural heritage, while Lone works with the MEDIA strand, covering the audiovisual industries including film, TV series and video games. #245 Culture and Creativity NCP… #245 Culture and Creativity NCP…
But the main focus is their work as a Creative Europe Desk. We look at how they help applicants identify relevant opportunities, qualify project ideas, understand calls, review applications, find international partners and navigate the particular language of EU funding. We also discuss what makes a strong Creative Europe proposal—including meaningful international collaboration, international potential, realistic project structures and strategies for reaching audiences.

Time codes:
00:00 En route and Arrival
05:26 Creative Europe Desk Denmark
13:52 Introducing Creative Europe
26:07 Supporting Danish Applicants
48:43 Developing a Strong Application
01:0010: Advice, reflections and the toughest challenge

Tidligere på året udsendte The Grant i samarbejde med Aalborg Universitets Missionssekretariat en podcastepisode som introducerede forskere og forskningsteams til missions-tilgangen. Nu er det blevet tid til en samtale om hvordan man effektmåler i den missionsdrevne forskningstilgang, når flere forskellige forskningsdiscipliner og samfundsaktører er involveret.

I episoden taler jeg med Maria Abel Nissen og Jacob Brix fra Aalborg Universitet om, hvad der gør effektmåling i missionsdrevet forskning anderledes end i et traditionelt forskningsprojekt. Samtalen tager udgangspunkt i, at en mission ikke kan vurderes alene på resultaterne fra de enkelte projekter. Effekten opstår i samspillet mellem projekter, forskningsmiljøer og de aktører uden for universitetet, som skal være med til at omsætte ny viden til konkrete forandringer.

Vi ser blandt andet på forskellen mellem teknologisk modenhed og samfundets evne til faktisk at optage og anvende nye løsninger. Her kommer begreber som Technology Readiness Level (TRL), Societal Readiness Level (SRL) og implementeringskraft i spil. Derefter går vi tættere på arbejdet med et impact framework: Hvordan kan man skabe en ramme, der forbinder missionens overordnede samfundsmål med porteføljer, projekter, aktiviteter, adfærdsændringer og den effekt, man i sidste ende ønsker at skabe?

Endelig diskuterer vi arbejdet med tippepunkter – de steder i en forandringsproces, hvor man begynder at kunne se, at noget reelt har flyttet sig – og hvad hele denne tilgang betyder for forskerne selv. For hvis effektmåling skal have værdi i en missionsdrevet tilgang, skal den ikke alene fungere som dokumentation og rapportering. Den skal også kunne bruges som et redskab til læring, prioritering og til at forstå, hvordan den enkelte forskningsindsats bidrager til en større samfundsmæssig forandring.

Tidskoder:
02:22 Gæsteintroduktion
05:52 Åbning: Hvorfor er det her spørgsmål vigtigt?
13:58 Hvad er særligt ved missionsdreven forskning?
24:02 Fra teknologi til samfund: TRL, SRL og implementeringskraft
30:59 Impact framework: Hvordan bygger man en ramme for at forstå effekt?
40:12 Tippepunkter: Hvornår kan vi se, at noget har flyttet sig?
51:05 Hvad betyder det for forskerne?
01:04:50 Afslutning: Hvad er næste skridt?