Uncommon Sense - The Official Podcast of the Society of Gilbert Keith Chesterton

G.K. Chesterton spent his life writing about Our Lady, and the poems are still doing their work. Maria Romine, drama teacher at Chesterton Academy of St. Louis, traces her entry into the Catholic Church to a rosary handed to her in a gift shop, and her love of Chesterton to a poem about the Mother of God. On Our Lady's birthday, the conversation covers the Frances Chesterton Rosary League, saints on the high school stage, and Gilbert and Frances Chesterton as a model for married life.
In this Episode:
Chesterton's Marian poems, "A Little Litany" above all, did what no argument had: they sent one Presbyterian convert on a years-long search to understand how a man comes to write that way about the Mother of God.
A Chesterton reading group in St. Louis began praying the rosary together, and within a few years an eager parent group had opened a Chesterton Academy there—a sequence the guest describes as the Holy Family finally getting its mother.
Chesterton built a theater inside his own house and wrote plays for the neighborhood children; his play The Surprise dramatizes the idea that human makers work under God as subcreators.
Memorizing a saint's words changes the actor who speaks them—the argument behind a Catholic high school's practice of building each year's production around a single saint.
Freshmen learn two lines before they learn any steps: "May I have this dance" and "I would be delighted." Nobody can be rejected, so nobody has to be nervous.
Resources:
G.K. Chesterton and Our Lady, edited by Nancy Carpentier Brown, with an essay by Maria Romine
The Surprise, G.K. Chesterton's play adapted for television by Dale Ahlquist
The Frances Chesterton Rosary League
Chesterton Academy of St. Louis on Instagram
Chesterton Academy of St. Louis on Facebook
FOLLOW US
Instagram
Facebook
X
SUPPORT
Donate
Shop
Chapters:
00:00: Welcome, and a guest on Our Lady's birthday
01:25: A convert, a gift-shop rosary, and Our Lady's last nudge
03:47: Three strangers, one question: are you consecrated?
05:33: Chesterton's Marian poems, and the quest they started
09:20: A rosary league first, then a Chesterton school in St. Louis
12:40: The stage as an incarnational art, and Chesterton's play The Surprise
14:28: Playing saints, and what memorized words do to a student
19:07: Teaching English country dance to freshmen
21:19: "May I have this dance": two lines that end the awkwardness
23:57: Daily Mass, and becoming small versions of Gilbert and Frances
27:32: The Society as the Chestertons' extended godchildren
31:41: The Legion of Mary, and a Marian plan for October
Produced by Saint Kolbe Studios

G.K. Chesterton gave an entire quarter of What's Wrong with the World to what he called the mistake about the child, and his verdict was blunt: the schoolmaster works not for the parent but against him. In this solo back-to-school episode, Joe Grabowski follows that argument through to the line Chesterton offers as the whole purpose of teaching—to pour that fiery simplicity upon the whole of life—and asks what it would take to recover the childlike wonder Chesterton insisted was education's only real aim.
What's in This Episode:
Why G.K. Chesterton opened What's Wrong with the World with a chapter about medicine, and what a doctor's knowledge of a healthy body has to do with schools
The chapter Chesterton titled The Outlawed Parent, where he charges that the schoolmaster works against the parent rather than for him
The single sentence Chesterton offers as the only real aim of education, and why it is easy to miss in a book this quotable
What Chesterton meant in In Defence of Baby Worship by a new universe inside every child's head, and why it does not make him an idealist
The passage in Orthodoxy where Chesterton imagines God saying "do it again" to the sun every morning
Resources Mentioned:
What's Wrong with the World
Orthodoxy
The Everlasting Man
The Defendant
Chesterton Schools Network
Chapters:
00:00: Introduction
00:30: Back to school, and what education is actually for
02:29: The medical mistake, and why we stopped asking what is right
04:47: Education, or the mistake about the child
07:42: Parents standing up at school board meetings
09:33: The Chesterton Schools Network
11:59: The only real aim of education
14:18: Keeping familiarity from breeding contempt
19:08: In Defence of Baby Worship, and a new universe in every head
21:31: The delight children take in inventing words
23:48: Man the sign maker, and Walker Percy on language
26:11: The eternal appetite of infancy
FOLLOW US
Instagram
Facebook
X
SUPPORT
Donate
Shop
Produced by Saint Kolbe Studios

On the feasts of Saints Monica and Augustine, Grettelyn Darkey and Joe Grabowski trace G.K. Chesterton's long road into the Catholic Church, beginning with his 1903 newspaper battle with Blatchford and McCabe and ending at the sacramental hesitation that held him back until 1922. They show why Chesterton refused to hang his belief on one or two arguments, and why a man for whom every daisy was already a miracle found it hardest to meet God in one particular priest. The takeaway is a habit any reader can practice: reading the world for connections, on the saints' feasts and on every other day of the year.
In This Episode:
Why Chesterton fits no single school. He is Augustinian, Thomistic, Franciscan, and Scotistic at once
What Chesterton actually told McCabe about the "two great pegs" his conversion supposedly hung on
Why fear, not doubt, marked Chesterton's final approach—and how it echoes Augustine's "not yet"
The sacramental hurdle for a man who already found God in sunshine and daisies
A Chestertonian habit to practice: connecting the unlikely and reading everything for truth
Resources Mentioned:
The Catholic Church and Conversion
Orthodoxy
The Man Who Was Thursday
The City of God (St. Augustine)
Episode art image credit: Nheyob, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons
Chapters:
00:00: Introduction
00:33: Welcome and Today's Topic
01:48: Why Chesterton Resists Every Label
05:30: The First Conversion and the Blatchford Controversy
10:38: Reading from The Catholic Church and Conversion
12:29: Fear, Not Doubt
14:52: The Sacraments as the Last Step
17:34: Free Will and the Marriage Metaphor
19:39: Augustine's Search and the Grace Behind It
23:09: Restlessness and the Search for Peace
27:07: The Policeman, the Anarchist, and the Fence
33:35: How to Become Chestertonian
FOLLOW US:
Instagram
Facebook
X
SUPPORT:
Donate
Shop
Produced by Saint Kolbe Studios

In 2016, Danish politician Ida Auken described the year 2030 as a happy place to live: no car, no house, no appliances, no privacy, and a living room lent out for business meetings whenever she steps away. Joe Grabowski and Grettelyn Darkey read Ida Auken's essay beside G.K. Chesterton, who had already named the bargain nearly a century before it was offered—that privacy is the mark of property, and that a people stripped of both are being fitted for a hive instead of a home. 
In This Episode:
Why G.K. Chesterton tied privacy to property, and why he said the Englishman's castle was too often hardly even a house
The bees, the beavers, and G.K. Chesterton's fundamental principle of private property
How Auken's 2030 city matches the servile state that G.K. Chesterton and Hilaire Belloc warned about
The one thing absent from a utopia built on shared living rooms: marriage, children, family
Why "having nothing and possessing all things" means the opposite of what socialism offers
Resources Mentioned:
Ida Auken, "Welcome to 2030. I own nothing, have no privacy, and life has never been better" (World Economic Forum, 2016)
G.K. Chesterton, "Prohibition and Property" (The New Witness, October 7, 1921)
G.K. Chesterton, "The Real Nature of Property (Again)" (The Illustrated London News, February 16, 1924)
G.K. Chesterton, "More About Divorce" (The Illustrated London News, September 2, 1922)
G.K. Chesterton, "The Peril of the Impersonal" (G.K.'s Weekly, November 9, 1929)
Chapters:
00:00: Welcome
02:38: Ida Auken's 2030
04:24: A living room used for business meetings
06:22: The people left outside the city
08:05: "No real privacy"
11:57: Renting by another name
13:49: G.K. Chesterton: privacy is like property
17:36: The hive and the home
21:19: The servile state
25:55: Bees, beavers, and the neglected commons
28:42: Divorce, marriage, and the telling pronoun
35:58: Having nothing and possessing all things
FOLLOW US
Instagram
Facebook
X
SUPPORT
Donate
Shop
Produced by Saint Kolbe Studios

Grettelyn Darkey and Joe Grabowski take up the most neuralgic subject in G.K. Chesterton scholarship: his defense of the French Revolution. Working through a 1921 Illustrated London News column, a 1905 Daily News essay setting the French and Russian revolutions side by side, and a 1918 New Witness piece that turns without warning to Prussianism, they trace his distinction between the ideals of a revolution and its working out, and his insistence that what a revolution exists to restore is the rights of man and not the wrongs of man. 
In This Episode:
Why G.K. Chesterton distinguished the motivations behind the French Revolution from its working out under Robespierre and the Terror
The negative equality G.K. Chesterton faulted the revolutionaries for—abolishing things for everybody instead of extending them to everybody
Why reading G.K. Chesterton on this subject without his British and monarchical audience in view produces anachronism, and what he held against Edmund Burke
G.K. Chesterton on positive and negative liberalism, and his warning that the modern revolutionist is free to hate anything, liberty itself included
The white post from Orthodoxy, radicalism as a return to the roots, and G.K. Chesterton's claim that revolution is the divine part of man
Resources Mentioned:
The Rightness of the French Revolution by G.K. Chesterton
Two Revolutions by G.K. Chesterton
The Two Feasts of Freedom
The Outline of Sanity by G.K. Chesterton (100th anniversary edition)
The Man Who Was Thursday by G.K. Chesterton
Chapters:
00:00: Introduction
00:30: Welcome—Revolutions, Independence Day, and Bastille Day
03:55: "The Rightness of the French Revolution" (1921)
05:26: Negative Equality and the Rationalist Epoch
07:40: G.K. Chesterton's Audience and the Danger of Anachronism
10:01: Politically Homeless—Belloc, the Vendée, and Edmund Burke
13:12: Knowing What You Are Talking About
17:11: "Two Revolutions" (1905) and the Songs of the Revolution
23:46: The White Post and the Job of the Conservative
26:27: "The Two Feasts of Freedom" (1918) and the Prussian Paralysis
28:00: Revolution as the Divine Part of Man
35:38: Watt Tyler and Painting the Fence Post
FOLLOW US
Instagram
Facebook
X
SUPPORT
Consider making a donation
Visit our Shop
Produced by Saint Kolbe Studios